Europe's towns and cities lit up at night, seen from orbit beneath the glow of the horizon.
For network states

Governance infrastructure for a new kind of country.

A network state starts as an online community and grows toward land and recognition. Every step of that path is a governance problem. Solon is built to carry it from the first member onward.

What a network state is

Srinivasan's path runs from a startup society to a network union to a network state — "cloud first, land last, but not land never." No network state has been recognized yet. What exists today are the early stages, and they are exactly where governance decides whether a community holds together.

Solon does not take a side on any community's cause. It is neutral infrastructure: the same rules engine and the same open record for any group that wants to govern itself.

“A network state is a highly aligned online community with a capacity for collective action that crowdfunds territory around the world and eventually gains diplomatic recognition from pre-existing states.”
— Balaji Srinivasan, The Network State (2022)

The path, and what each step needs

  1. 01

    Found a startup society

    A founding record and a roll of members.

    Found the organization and take the first seat; every later admission is on the record.

  2. 02

    Organize for collective action

    A way to decide together that members trust.

    Proposals, votes and counting methods the community chooses — and can change by vote.

  3. 03

    Build trust offline and an economy online

    Open books and money that moves without a bank.

    Open treasuries on Solon; payments and funding through OrangeCat.

  4. 04

    Crowdfund physical places

    Pooled money spent only as the members decided.

    Spending decided by vote, carried out through OrangeCat, receipts on the record.

  5. 05

    Connect them into an archipelago

    Local groups that govern themselves and decide some things together.

    Groups of groups: each place its own organization, all members of a larger one.

  6. 06

    Take an on-chain census

    A membership count anyone can verify.

    A signed roll: members who sign their seat can be counted without trusting a clerk.

  7. 07

    Seek recognition

    Evidence of legitimate, accountable self-government.

    Years of decisions anyone can recount. Recognition is political; the record is how a community earns the conversation.

What works today

  • Start an organization

    Anyone with an OrangeCat account can found one in a minute and take the first seat.

    Available now
  • Signed votes

    Members who want to can sign with their own key, so anyone can recount without trusting Solon.

    Available now
  • A record that only grows

    Every step is written once and published; every decision comes with everything needed to recount it.

    Available now
  • Open books

    Register the group's Bitcoin addresses and every member sees the balance, read straight from the chain.

    Available now
  • Admission by vote

    Someone asks to join; the members decide, and the record shows who admitted whom.

    Planned
  • Rules you change by vote

    The group's own rulebook — who votes on what, by how much — amended through the group's own votes.

    Planned
  • Groups of groups

    Organizations join a larger one as members, each voting by its own internal decision.

    Planned
  • Leave with your record

    Export the whole signed history and take it to another host, where it can be checked again.

    Planned

A place to start

Solon's rule template for this kind of group sets who may vote on what, how votes are counted, and how many must agree. It is a starting point: your group changes it by vote.

Compare the templates
How this works in detail

Srinivasan's own definition includes "a consensual government limited by a social smart contract". Solon's approach to that phrase is deliberately plain: the rules are data the members can read and amend by vote, every decision is published with the evidence to recount it, and the executors — money and work — act only on a verified decision.

Two cautions carried over from history. A majority can wrongly decide who counts — Appenzell Innerrhoden's assembly refused women the vote until a federal court intervened in 1990 — so decisions about membership are reserved to people and recorded in full. And software is not sovereignty: Solon can make a community legible and accountable; it cannot make a border move.

Technical reference