Finance Act 1995
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
156 Proceedings for tax in sheriff court.
(1) Section 67 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (proceedings for tax in sheriff court) shall be amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1) (tax not exceeding a specified sum recoverable in sheriff court) for the words from “where” to “the tax” there shall be substituted “ tax due and payable under any assessment ”. (3) The following subsection shall be inserted after subsection (1)— (1A) An officer of the Board who is authorised by the Board to do so may address the court in any proceedings under this section. (4) This section shall apply in relation to proceedings commenced after the day on which this Act is passed.
156 Proceedings for tax in sheriff court.
(1) Section 67 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (proceedings for tax in sheriff court) shall be amended as follows. (2) In subsection (1) (tax not exceeding a specified sum recoverable in sheriff court) for the words from “where” to “the tax” there shall be substituted “ tax due and payable under any assessment ”. (3) The following subsection shall be inserted after subsection (1)— (1A) An officer of the Board who is authorised by the Board to do so may address the court in any proceedings under this section. (4) This section shall apply in relation to proceedings commenced after the day on which this Act is passed.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.