The Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
43 Trees subject to tree preservation orders
(1) Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the undertaker must not fell or lop or cut back the roots of any tree which is the subject of a tree preservation order. (2) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree within or overhanging land within the Order limits subject to a tree preservation order whensoever made or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with onshore site preparation works the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised project or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised project or its decommissioning. (3) In carrying out any activity authorised by sub-paragraph (2)— (a) the undertaker must not cause unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (4) The authority given by sub-paragraph (2) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (5) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under sub-paragraph (3), or as to the amount of compensation, must be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
43 Trees subject to tree preservation orders
(1) Subject to sub-paragraph (2), the undertaker must not fell or lop or cut back the roots of any tree which is the subject of a tree preservation order. (2) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree within or overhanging land within the Order limits subject to a tree preservation order whensoever made or cut back its roots, if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so in order to prevent the tree from obstructing or interfering with onshore site preparation works the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised project or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised project or its decommissioning. (3) In carrying out any activity authorised by sub-paragraph (2)— (a) the undertaker must not cause unnecessary damage to any tree and must pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity; and (b) the duty contained in section 206(1) (replacement of trees) of the 1990 Act does not apply. (4) The authority given by sub-paragraph (2) constitutes a deemed consent under the relevant tree preservation order. (5) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under sub-paragraph (3), or as to the amount of compensation, must be determined under Part 1 (determination of questions of disputed compensation) of the 1961 Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.