Policyholders Protection Act 1997 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
16 Extension of definition of “policy holder”.
(1) In section 32 of the 1975 Act (interpretation), in subsection (2) (which provides that expressions used in that Act have the same meaning as in the Insurance Companies Act 1982), after “above,” there shall be inserted “ but subject to subsection (2ZA) below ”. (2) After that subsection there shall be inserted— (2ZA) In its application by virtue of subsection (2) above, the definition of the expression “policy holder” (in section 96(1) of the Insurance Companies Act 1982) shall have effect as if the reference in paragraph (b) of the definition to a person to whom a sum is due included a person to whom a sum is contingently due.
16 Extension of definition of “policy holder”.
(1) In section 32 of the 1975 Act (interpretation), in subsection (2) (which provides that expressions used in that Act have the same meaning as in the Insurance Companies Act 1982), after “above,” there shall be inserted “ but subject to subsection (2ZA) below ”. (2) After that subsection there shall be inserted— (2ZA) In its application by virtue of subsection (2) above, the definition of the expression “policy holder” (in section 96(1) of the Insurance Companies Act 1982) shall have effect as if the reference in paragraph (b) of the definition to a person to whom a sum is due included a person to whom a sum is contingently due.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.