The A46 Newark Bypass Development Consent Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
45 Felling or lopping of trees and removal of hedgerows
(1) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree or shrub, or cut back its roots, within or overhanging land within the Order limits if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so to prevent the tree or shrub— (a) from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development; or (b) from constituting a danger to persons using the authorised development. (2) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1) or (4) the undertaker must— (a) do no unnecessary damage to any tree or shrub; and (b) pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity. (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (2)(b), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined as if it were a dispute under Part 1 of the 1961 Act. (4) The undertaker may, for the purposes of carrying out the authorised development but subject to paragraph (2)— (a) remove any hedgerow described in Part 1 (removal of hedgerows) of Schedule 8 (hedgerows and trees); and (b) subject to consultation with the relevant planning authority, remove any hedgerow within the Order limits that may be identified and that is not otherwise set out within Part 1 of Schedule 8. (5) In this article “hedgerow” includes a hedgerow to which the Hedgerows Regulations 1997 apply and includes important hedgerows.
45 Felling or lopping of trees and removal of hedgerows
(1) The undertaker may fell or lop any tree or shrub, or cut back its roots, within or overhanging land within the Order limits if it reasonably believes it to be necessary to do so to prevent the tree or shrub— (a) from obstructing or interfering with the construction, maintenance or operation of the authorised development or any apparatus used in connection with the authorised development; or (b) from constituting a danger to persons using the authorised development. (2) In carrying out any activity authorised by paragraph (1) or (4) the undertaker must— (a) do no unnecessary damage to any tree or shrub; and (b) pay compensation to any person for any loss or damage arising from such activity. (c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) Any dispute as to a person’s entitlement to compensation under paragraph (2)(b), or as to the amount of compensation, is to be determined as if it were a dispute under Part 1 of the 1961 Act. (4) The undertaker may, for the purposes of carrying out the authorised development but subject to paragraph (2)— (a) remove any hedgerow described in Part 1 (removal of hedgerows) of Schedule 8 (hedgerows and trees); and (b) subject to consultation with the relevant planning authority, remove any hedgerow within the Order limits that may be identified and that is not otherwise set out within Part 1 of Schedule 8. (5) In this article “hedgerow” includes a hedgerow to which the Hedgerows Regulations 1997 apply and includes important hedgerows.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.