Consolidated Fund (Appropriation) Act 2000 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE (B).—Part 20 Class XVIII
Schedule of Sums granted, and of the sums which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges for the Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 2001, viz:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote 1. For expenditure by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and Health Service Commissioner for England on administrative costs, and on providing services to support the Scottish Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Welsh Administration Ombudsman and Health Service Commissioners for Scotland and Wales..................... | 14,070,000 | 500,000 2. For expenditure by the House of Lords on Peers’ expenses and administrative costs, including staff pensions, security, stationery, printing, financial assistance to Opposition parties, and a grant in aid to the History of Parliament Trust..................... | 31,391,000 | 2,745,000 3. For expenditure by the House of Lords on works services: including a payment to the House of Commons in respect of Administration and a grant in aid to the House of Lords’ Works of Art Collection Fund..................... | 18,152,000 | 867,000 4. For expenditure by the House of Commons on Members’ salaries, allowances, pensions, etc., financial assistance to Opposition parties, and an Exchequer contribution to the Members’ Fund..................... | 95,416,000 Total, Class XVIII....................£ | 159,029,000 | 4,112,000
SCHEDULE (B).—Part 20 Class XVIII
Schedule of Sums granted, and of the sums which may be applied as appropriations in aid in addition thereto, to defray the charges for the Services herein particularly mentioned, which will come in course of payment during the year ending on 31st March 2001, viz:— Sums not exceeding Supply Grants | Appropriations in Aid £ | £ Vote 1. For expenditure by the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration and Health Service Commissioner for England on administrative costs, and on providing services to support the Scottish Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Welsh Administration Ombudsman and Health Service Commissioners for Scotland and Wales..................... | 14,070,000 | 500,000 2. For expenditure by the House of Lords on Peers’ expenses and administrative costs, including staff pensions, security, stationery, printing, financial assistance to Opposition parties, and a grant in aid to the History of Parliament Trust..................... | 31,391,000 | 2,745,000 3. For expenditure by the House of Lords on works services: including a payment to the House of Commons in respect of Administration and a grant in aid to the House of Lords’ Works of Art Collection Fund..................... | 18,152,000 | 867,000 4. For expenditure by the House of Commons on Members’ salaries, allowances, pensions, etc., financial assistance to Opposition parties, and an Exchequer contribution to the Members’ Fund..................... | 95,416,000 Total, Class XVIII....................£ | 159,029,000 | 4,112,000
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.