Offender Management Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
35 Escort arrangements
(1) Schedule 1 to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (c. 33) (escort arrangements: England and Wales) is amended as follows. (2) In the heading to paragraph 1, for “offenders detained at secure training centres” there is substituted “ persons detained in youth detention accommodation ”. (3) In paragraph 1 (arrangements for the escort of offenders detained at secure training centres)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), for “offenders” in paragraphs (a) and (b) there is substituted “ detained persons ” and for paragraphs (c) and (d) there is substituted— (c) the custody of detained persons temporarily held in youth detention accommodation in the course of delivery from one such place of accommodation to another; and (d) the custody of detained persons while they are outside a place of youth detention accommodation for temporary purposes, , and (b) in sub-paragraph (2), for “a court, secure training centre” there is substituted “ a place of youth detention accommodation or a court ”. (4) In paragraph 4 (interpretation)— (a) before the definition of “escort arrangements” there is inserted— “detained person” means a person remanded or committed to accommodation which is youth detention accommodation or detained in any such accommodation pursuant to a sentence or order requiring the person to be detained; , and (b) the definitions of “offender” and “secure training centre” are omitted.
35 Escort arrangements
(1) Schedule 1 to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (c. 33) (escort arrangements: England and Wales) is amended as follows. (2) In the heading to paragraph 1, for “offenders detained at secure training centres” there is substituted “ persons detained in youth detention accommodation ”. (3) In paragraph 1 (arrangements for the escort of offenders detained at secure training centres)— (a) in sub-paragraph (1), for “offenders” in paragraphs (a) and (b) there is substituted “ detained persons ” and for paragraphs (c) and (d) there is substituted— (c) the custody of detained persons temporarily held in youth detention accommodation in the course of delivery from one such place of accommodation to another; and (d) the custody of detained persons while they are outside a place of youth detention accommodation for temporary purposes, , and (b) in sub-paragraph (2), for “a court, secure training centre” there is substituted “ a place of youth detention accommodation or a court ”. (4) In paragraph 4 (interpretation)— (a) before the definition of “escort arrangements” there is inserted— “detained person” means a person remanded or committed to accommodation which is youth detention accommodation or detained in any such accommodation pursuant to a sentence or order requiring the person to be detained; , and (b) the definitions of “offender” and “secure training centre” are omitted.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.