Badgers Act 1973 (repealed 16.10.1992)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Offences of cruelty.
(1) If any person shall— (a) cruelly ill-treat any badger, (b) use in the course of killing or taking, or attempting to kill or take any badger, any badger tongs, (c) save as permitted by or under this Act, dig for any badger, or (d) use for the purpose of killing or taking any badger any firearm other than a smooth bore weapon of not less than 20 bore or a rifle using ammunition having a muzzle energy of not less than 160 footpounds and a bullet weighing not less than 38 grains, he shall be guilty of an offence. (2) If, in any proceedings for an offence under subsection (1)(c) above, there is evidence from which it could reasonably be concluded that at the material time the accused was digging for a badger, he shall be presumed to have been digging for a badger unless the contrary is shown. (3) If any person shall interfere with a badger sett by doing any of the following things, that is to say— (a) damaging a badger sett or any part thereof; (b) destroying a badger sett; (c) obstructing access to or any entrance of a badger sett; (d) causing a dog to enter a badger sett; or (e) disturbing a badger when it is occupying a badger sett, intending to do any of those things or being reckless as to whether his actions will have any of those consequences, he shall be guilty of an offence.
2 Offences of cruelty.
(1) If any person shall— (a) cruelly ill-treat any badger, (b) use in the course of killing or taking, or attempting to kill or take any badger, any badger tongs, (c) save as permitted by or under this Act, dig for any badger, or (d) use for the purpose of killing or taking any badger any firearm other than a smooth bore weapon of not less than 20 bore or a rifle using ammunition having a muzzle energy of not less than 160 footpounds and a bullet weighing not less than 38 grains, he shall be guilty of an offence. (2) If, in any proceedings for an offence under subsection (1)(c) above, there is evidence from which it could reasonably be concluded that at the material time the accused was digging for a badger, he shall be presumed to have been digging for a badger unless the contrary is shown. (3) If any person shall interfere with a badger sett by doing any of the following things, that is to say— (a) damaging a badger sett or any part thereof; (b) destroying a badger sett; (c) obstructing access to or any entrance of a badger sett; (d) causing a dog to enter a badger sett; or (e) disturbing a badger when it is occupying a badger sett, intending to do any of those things or being reckless as to whether his actions will have any of those consequences, he shall be guilty of an offence.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.