Serious Crime Act 2007
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
5B Electronic monitoring requirements
(1) A serious crime prevention order made by a court in England and Wales may require an individual (including a partner in a partnership) to submit to electronic monitoring of their compliance with prohibitions, restrictions or other requirements imposed by the order. (2) A requirement imposed under subsection (1) is referred to in this Part as an “electronic monitoring requirement”. (3) A serious crime prevention order that includes an electronic monitoring requirement must specify the person who is to be responsible for the monitoring. (4) The person specified under subsection (3) (“the responsible person”) must be of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) Where a serious crime prevention order imposes an electronic monitoring requirement on a person, the person must (among other things)— (a) submit, as required from time to time by the responsible person, to— (i) being fitted with, or the installation of, any necessary apparatus, and (ii) the inspection or repair of any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring; (b) not interfere with, or with the working of, any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring; (c) take any steps required by the responsible person for the purpose of keeping in working order any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring. These obligations have effect as requirements of the order. (6) A serious crime prevention order may not provide for an electronic monitoring requirement to have effect for more than 12 months (but this does not limit any power of a court to extend that period).
5B Electronic monitoring requirements
(1) A serious crime prevention order made by a court in England and Wales may require an individual (including a partner in a partnership) to submit to electronic monitoring of their compliance with prohibitions, restrictions or other requirements imposed by the order. (2) A requirement imposed under subsection (1) is referred to in this Part as an “electronic monitoring requirement”. (3) A serious crime prevention order that includes an electronic monitoring requirement must specify the person who is to be responsible for the monitoring. (4) The person specified under subsection (3) (“the responsible person”) must be of a description specified in regulations made by the Secretary of State. (5) Where a serious crime prevention order imposes an electronic monitoring requirement on a person, the person must (among other things)— (a) submit, as required from time to time by the responsible person, to— (i) being fitted with, or the installation of, any necessary apparatus, and (ii) the inspection or repair of any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring; (b) not interfere with, or with the working of, any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring; (c) take any steps required by the responsible person for the purpose of keeping in working order any apparatus fitted or installed for the purpose of the monitoring. These obligations have effect as requirements of the order. (6) A serious crime prevention order may not provide for an electronic monitoring requirement to have effect for more than 12 months (but this does not limit any power of a court to extend that period).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.