Propose a change

Companies Act 1985

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

452 Privileged information.

(1) Nothing in sections 431 to 446E compels the disclosure by any person to the Secretary of State or to an inspector appointed by him of information in respect of which in an action in the High Court a claim to legal professional privilege, or in an action in the Court of Session a claim to confidentiality of communications, could be maintained. (1A) Nothing in section 434, 443 or 446 requires a person (except as mentioned in subsection (1B) below) to disclose information or produce documents in respect of which he owes an obligation of confidence by virtue of carrying on the business of banking unless— (a) the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed is the company or other body corporate under investigation, (b) the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed consents to the disclosure or production, or (c) the making of the requirement is authorised by the Secretary of State. (1B) Subsection (1A) does not apply where the person owing the obligation of confidence is the company or other body corporate under investigation under section 431, 432 or 433. (2) Nothing in sections 447 to 451— (a) compels the production by any person of a document or the disclosure by any person of information in respect of which in an action in the High Court a claim to legal professional privilege, or in an action in the Court of Session a claim to confidentiality of communications, could be maintained; (b) authorises the taking of possession of any such document which is in the person’s possession. (3) The Secretary of State must not under section 447 require, or authorise a person to require— (a) the production by a person carrying on the business of banking of a document relating to the affairs of a customer of his, or (b) the disclosure by him of information relating to those affairs, unless one of the conditions in subsection (4) is met. (4) The conditions are— (a) the Secretary of State thinks it is necessary to do so for the purpose of investigating the affairs of the person carrying on the business of banking; (b) the customer is a person on whom a requirement has been imposed under section 447; (c) the customer is a person on whom a requirement to produce information or documents has been imposed by an investigator appointed by the Secretary of State in pursuance of section 171 or 173 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (powers of persons appointed under section 167 or as a result of section 168(2) to conduct an investigation). (5) Despite subsections (1) and (2) a person who is a lawyer may be compelled to disclose the name and address of his client.

Your change, as a redline

452 Privileged information.

(1) Nothing in sections 431 to 446E compels the disclosure by any person to the Secretary of State or to an inspector appointed by him of information in respect of which in an action in the High Court a claim to legal professional privilege, or in an action in the Court of Session a claim to confidentiality of communications, could be maintained. (1A) Nothing in section 434, 443 or 446 requires a person (except as mentioned in subsection (1B) below) to disclose information or produce documents in respect of which he owes an obligation of confidence by virtue of carrying on the business of banking unless— (a) the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed is the company or other body corporate under investigation, (b) the person to whom the obligation of confidence is owed consents to the disclosure or production, or (c) the making of the requirement is authorised by the Secretary of State. (1B) Subsection (1A) does not apply where the person owing the obligation of confidence is the company or other body corporate under investigation under section 431, 432 or 433. (2) Nothing in sections 447 to 451— (a) compels the production by any person of a document or the disclosure by any person of information in respect of which in an action in the High Court a claim to legal professional privilege, or in an action in the Court of Session a claim to confidentiality of communications, could be maintained; (b) authorises the taking of possession of any such document which is in the person’s possession. (3) The Secretary of State must not under section 447 require, or authorise a person to require— (a) the production by a person carrying on the business of banking of a document relating to the affairs of a customer of his, or (b) the disclosure by him of information relating to those affairs, unless one of the conditions in subsection (4) is met. (4) The conditions are— (a) the Secretary of State thinks it is necessary to do so for the purpose of investigating the affairs of the person carrying on the business of banking; (b) the customer is a person on whom a requirement has been imposed under section 447; (c) the customer is a person on whom a requirement to produce information or documents has been imposed by an investigator appointed by the Secretary of State in pursuance of section 171 or 173 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (powers of persons appointed under section 167 or as a result of section 168(2) to conduct an investigation). (5) Despite subsections (1) and (2) a person who is a lawyer may be compelled to disclose the name and address of his client.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds