Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

1179CI Disqualifying arrangements and non-commercial transactions

(1) Subsections (2) and (3) apply if, at any time, a company is party to disqualifying arrangements in relation to anything that is, was or becomes a qualifying production (“the production”). (2) The company is not entitled to an expenditure credit under this Chapter in respect of the production for any accounting period. (3) Any relevant company tax return must be amended accordingly. (4) Subsection (5) applies if a transaction— (a) is attributable to arrangements (other than disqualifying arrangements) entered into otherwise than for genuine commercial reasons, and (b) would result in a company obtaining a relevant advantage. (5) The relevant advantage is to be counteracted by the making of just and reasonable adjustments to any amounts relevant to the calculation of the company’s entitlement to an expenditure credit under this Chapter. (6) Those adjustments may be made (for example) by way of amendment, assessment, or modification of an assessment. (7) For the purposes of this section, arrangements are disqualifying arrangements if their main purpose, or one of their main purposes, is to enable the company to obtain a relevant advantage. (8) But such arrangements are not disqualifying arrangements if the obtaining of that advantage as a result of the arrangements could reasonably be regarded as consistent with— (a) the principles (whether expressed or implied) on which the provisions of this Part are based, and (b) the policy objectives of those provisions. (9) For the purposes of this section, a company would obtain a relevant advantage if it would become entitled to an expenditure credit under this Chapter— (a) to which it would not otherwise be entitled, or (b) of a greater amount than that to which it would otherwise be entitled. (10) In this section, “arrangements” includes any scheme, agreement or understanding, whether or not legally enforceable.

Your change, as a redline

1179CI Disqualifying arrangements and non-commercial transactions

(1) Subsections (2) and (3) apply if, at any time, a company is party to disqualifying arrangements in relation to anything that is, was or becomes a qualifying production (“the production”). (2) The company is not entitled to an expenditure credit under this Chapter in respect of the production for any accounting period. (3) Any relevant company tax return must be amended accordingly. (4) Subsection (5) applies if a transaction— (a) is attributable to arrangements (other than disqualifying arrangements) entered into otherwise than for genuine commercial reasons, and (b) would result in a company obtaining a relevant advantage. (5) The relevant advantage is to be counteracted by the making of just and reasonable adjustments to any amounts relevant to the calculation of the company’s entitlement to an expenditure credit under this Chapter. (6) Those adjustments may be made (for example) by way of amendment, assessment, or modification of an assessment. (7) For the purposes of this section, arrangements are disqualifying arrangements if their main purpose, or one of their main purposes, is to enable the company to obtain a relevant advantage. (8) But such arrangements are not disqualifying arrangements if the obtaining of that advantage as a result of the arrangements could reasonably be regarded as consistent with— (a) the principles (whether expressed or implied) on which the provisions of this Part are based, and (b) the policy objectives of those provisions. (9) For the purposes of this section, a company would obtain a relevant advantage if it would become entitled to an expenditure credit under this Chapter— (a) to which it would not otherwise be entitled, or (b) of a greater amount than that to which it would otherwise be entitled. (10) In this section, “arrangements” includes any scheme, agreement or understanding, whether or not legally enforceable.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds