Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

1217RF “Qualifying expenditure”

(1) In this Chapter “qualifying expenditure”, in relation to the production of a concert or concert series, means core expenditure (see section 1217RC) on the production that— (a) falls to be taken into account under sections 1217QB to 1217QG in calculating the profit or loss of the separate orchestral trade for tax purposes, ... (b) is not expenditure which is otherwise relievable, and (c) is not excluded by subsection (3). (2) For the purposes of this section expenditure is otherwise relievable if it is expenditure in respect of which the company would be able to claim— (za) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (zb) relief under Part 13 (relief for expenditure on research and development), (a) film tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15, (b) television tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15A, (c) video games tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15B, (d) an additional deduction under Part 15C (theatrical productions), or (e) a theatre tax credit under Part 15C. (3) Expenditure is excluded to the extent that it represents connected party profit, unless subsection (5) applies. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), expenditure represents connected party profit— (a) if it is a payment to a person (“C”) in exchange for something supplied, transferred or done by that person, (b) if the company is connected with C, and (c) if, and to the extent that, the amount of the payment exceeds the expenditure incurred by C in supplying, transferring or doing that thing. (5) This subsection applies if the amount of the payment is no more than would have been the case had the transaction been entered into at arm’s length. (6) A transaction would have been entered into “at arm’s length” if it made “the arm’s length provision” within the meaning of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (and for this purpose any limitation on the application of that Part is to be disregarded). (7) Subsections (8) and (9) apply if— (a) the supply by C to the company is one of a sequence of transactions in which the thing supplied has been supplied by one person to another, and (b) either— (i) each transacting party in the sequence is connected to at least one other transacting party in the sequence, or (ii) each transaction in the sequence is entered into in furtherance of a single scheme or arrangement (of whatever kind, and whether or not legally enforceable). (8) The reference to C in subsection (4)(c) is to be read as a reference to the supplier in the first transaction in the sequence. (9) The reference to the transaction in subsection (5) is to be read as including each transaction in the sequence. (10) In this section, “payment” includes any transfer of value.

Your change, as a redline

1217RF “Qualifying expenditure”

(1) In this Chapter “qualifying expenditure”, in relation to the production of a concert or concert series, means core expenditure (see section 1217RC) on the production that— (a) falls to be taken into account under sections 1217QB to 1217QG in calculating the profit or loss of the separate orchestral trade for tax purposes, ... (b) is not expenditure which is otherwise relievable, and (c) is not excluded by subsection (3). (2) For the purposes of this section expenditure is otherwise relievable if it is expenditure in respect of which the company would be able to claim— (za) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (zb) relief under Part 13 (relief for expenditure on research and development), (a) film tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15, (b) television tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15A, (c) video games tax relief under Chapter 3 of Part 15B, (d) an additional deduction under Part 15C (theatrical productions), or (e) a theatre tax credit under Part 15C. (3) Expenditure is excluded to the extent that it represents connected party profit, unless subsection (5) applies. (4) For the purposes of subsection (3), expenditure represents connected party profit— (a) if it is a payment to a person (“C”) in exchange for something supplied, transferred or done by that person, (b) if the company is connected with C, and (c) if, and to the extent that, the amount of the payment exceeds the expenditure incurred by C in supplying, transferring or doing that thing. (5) This subsection applies if the amount of the payment is no more than would have been the case had the transaction been entered into at arm’s length. (6) A transaction would have been entered into “at arm’s length” if it made “the arm’s length provision” within the meaning of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (and for this purpose any limitation on the application of that Part is to be disregarded). (7) Subsections (8) and (9) apply if— (a) the supply by C to the company is one of a sequence of transactions in which the thing supplied has been supplied by one person to another, and (b) either— (i) each transacting party in the sequence is connected to at least one other transacting party in the sequence, or (ii) each transaction in the sequence is entered into in furtherance of a single scheme or arrangement (of whatever kind, and whether or not legally enforceable). (8) The reference to C in subsection (4)(c) is to be read as a reference to the supplier in the first transaction in the sequence. (9) The reference to the transaction in subsection (5) is to be read as including each transaction in the sequence. (10) In this section, “payment” includes any transfer of value.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds