Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18I Exemptions from anti-diversion rule

(1) The exemptions referred to in section 18G(1)(c) are the exemptions set out in Chapters 11 to 14 of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 (controlled foreign companies: exemptions from the CFC charge). (2) In applying those Chapters for the purposes of section 18G(1)(c)— (a) references to section 371BA(2)(b) of TIOPA 2010 are to be read as references to section 18G(1)(c), (b) the assumptions set out in subsection (3) are to be made, and (c) section 371VF(3) of TIOPA 2010 (definition of “related” person) is to be read with the omission of paragraphs (b) and (c). (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b), assume— (a) that the permanent establishment which company X has in territory X is a separate company from company X, (b) that the separate company is a CFC resident in territory X, (c) that period X and company X's other accounting periods for corporation tax purposes are accounting periods of the CFC for the purposes of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010, (d) that the CFC's assumed total profits for period X are the adjusted relevant profits amount, (e) that the CFC's assumed taxable total profits for period X are the same as the CFC's assumed total profits for period X, (f) that the CFC is connected with company X and is also connected or associated with any person with whom company X is connected or associated, and (g) that any person who has an interest in company X also has an interest in the CFC. (4) Chapters 11 to 14 of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 are also to be applied subject to sections 18IA to 18ID below.

Your change, as a redline

18I Exemptions from anti-diversion rule

(1) The exemptions referred to in section 18G(1)(c) are the exemptions set out in Chapters 11 to 14 of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 (controlled foreign companies: exemptions from the CFC charge). (2) In applying those Chapters for the purposes of section 18G(1)(c)— (a) references to section 371BA(2)(b) of TIOPA 2010 are to be read as references to section 18G(1)(c), (b) the assumptions set out in subsection (3) are to be made, and (c) section 371VF(3) of TIOPA 2010 (definition of “related” person) is to be read with the omission of paragraphs (b) and (c). (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b), assume— (a) that the permanent establishment which company X has in territory X is a separate company from company X, (b) that the separate company is a CFC resident in territory X, (c) that period X and company X's other accounting periods for corporation tax purposes are accounting periods of the CFC for the purposes of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010, (d) that the CFC's assumed total profits for period X are the adjusted relevant profits amount, (e) that the CFC's assumed taxable total profits for period X are the same as the CFC's assumed total profits for period X, (f) that the CFC is connected with company X and is also connected or associated with any person with whom company X is connected or associated, and (g) that any person who has an interest in company X also has an interest in the CFC. (4) Chapters 11 to 14 of Part 9A of TIOPA 2010 are also to be applied subject to sections 18IA to 18ID below.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds