Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

346 Transferee leaving group because of exempt distribution

(1) This section applies if— (a) the transferee ceases to be a member of the relevant group just because of a distribution which is exempt as a result of section 1075 of CTA 2010 (exempt distributions), and (b) there is a chargeable payment within the meaning of section 1088(1) of CTA 2010 (chargeable payments connected with exempt distributions) within 5 years after the making of that distribution. (2) ... This Part applies as if— (a) the transferee had assigned the asset or liability representing the relevant loan relationship immediately before the chargeable payment was made, (b) the assignment had been for consideration of an amount equal to the fair value of the asset or liability immediately before the transferee ceased to be a member of the relevant group, and (c) the transferee had immediately reacquired the asset or liability for consideration of the same amount. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

346 Transferee leaving group because of exempt distribution

(1) This section applies if— (a) the transferee ceases to be a member of the relevant group just because of a distribution which is exempt as a result of section 1075 of CTA 2010 (exempt distributions), and (b) there is a chargeable payment within the meaning of section 1088(1) of CTA 2010 (chargeable payments connected with exempt distributions) within 5 years after the making of that distribution. (2) ... This Part applies as if— (a) the transferee had assigned the asset or liability representing the relevant loan relationship immediately before the chargeable payment was made, (b) the assignment had been for consideration of an amount equal to the fair value of the asset or liability immediately before the transferee ceased to be a member of the relevant group, and (c) the transferee had immediately reacquired the asset or liability for consideration of the same amount. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds