Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

371 Interpretation

(1) In this Chapter— “consortium company” means a trading company, as defined by section 185(1) of CTA 2010, that is owned by a consortium or a holding company that is so owned, “debtor consortium company” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “group accounting period” is to be read in accordance with section 370, “group member” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “group relief” has the meaning given by section 364(4), “holding company” has the same meaning as in Part 5 of CTA 2010 (see section 185(2) of that Act), “member”, in relation to a consortium, has the same meaning as in Part 5 of CTA 2010 (see section 153(2) of that Act), “member company” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “net consortium debit” is to be read in accordance with section 365(2) and (3), “relevant consortium creditor relationship” is to be read in accordance with section 364(2), and “subsidiary”, in relation to a company which is a holding company, means a trading company (as defined by section 185(1) of CTA 2010) that, by reference to that holding company, is owned by a consortium by virtue of section 153(3) of that Act. (2) Any reference in this Chapter to a company being owned by a consortium is to be read in accordance with section 153 of CTA 2010. (3) Any reference in this Chapter to two companies being members of the same group of companies is a reference to those companies being members of the same group of companies for the purposes of Part 5 of CTA 2010 (group relief) (see section 152 of that Act).

Your change, as a redline

371 Interpretation

(1) In this Chapter— “consortium company” means a trading company, as defined by section 185(1) of CTA 2010, that is owned by a consortium or a holding company that is so owned, “debtor consortium company” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “group accounting period” is to be read in accordance with section 370, “group member” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “group relief” has the meaning given by section 364(4), “holding company” has the same meaning as in Part 5 of CTA 2010 (see section 185(2) of that Act), “member”, in relation to a consortium, has the same meaning as in Part 5 of CTA 2010 (see section 153(2) of that Act), “member company” has the same meaning as in section 364 (see section 364(2)), “net consortium debit” is to be read in accordance with section 365(2) and (3), “relevant consortium creditor relationship” is to be read in accordance with section 364(2), and “subsidiary”, in relation to a company which is a holding company, means a trading company (as defined by section 185(1) of CTA 2010) that, by reference to that holding company, is owned by a consortium by virtue of section 153(3) of that Act. (2) Any reference in this Chapter to a company being owned by a consortium is to be read in accordance with section 153 of CTA 2010. (3) Any reference in this Chapter to two companies being members of the same group of companies is a reference to those companies being members of the same group of companies for the purposes of Part 5 of CTA 2010 (group relief) (see section 152 of that Act).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds