Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

376 Interpretation of section 375

(1) For the purposes of section 375 and this section, Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “close company”) applies with the omission of section 442(a) (exclusion of non-resident companies). (2) A person who is a participator in a company which controls another company is treated for the purposes of section 375 and this section as being a participator in that other company also. (3) Subject to that, in section 375 and this section “participator”, in relation to a company, means a person who is a participator in the company within the meaning given by section 454 of CTA 2010, but not a person who is such a participator just because of being a loan creditor of the company. (4) Section 472 (meaning of “control”) applies for the purposes of section 375 and this section. (5) In section 375— “CIS-based close company” means a company which would not be a close company apart from the rights and powers of one or more partners in a CIS limited partnership being attributed to another of the partners under section 451(4) to (6) of CTA 2010 because of section 448(1)(a) of that Act, “CIS limited partnership” means a limited partnership— which is a collective investment scheme, or which would be a collective investment scheme if it were not a body corporate, “non-qualifying territory” has the meaning given by section 173 of TIOPA 2010, “resident for tax purposes” means liable, under the law of the non-qualifying territory, to tax there by reason of domicile, residence or place of management, and “small or medium-sized enterprise” has the meaning given by section 172 of TIOPA 2010. (6) For the purposes of section 375, a non-qualifying territory is “non-taxing” if companies are not under its law liable to tax by reason of domicile, residence or place of management.

Your change, as a redline

376 Interpretation of section 375

(1) For the purposes of section 375 and this section, Chapter 2 of Part 10 of CTA 2010 (meaning of “close company”) applies with the omission of section 442(a) (exclusion of non-resident companies). (2) A person who is a participator in a company which controls another company is treated for the purposes of section 375 and this section as being a participator in that other company also. (3) Subject to that, in section 375 and this section “participator”, in relation to a company, means a person who is a participator in the company within the meaning given by section 454 of CTA 2010, but not a person who is such a participator just because of being a loan creditor of the company. (4) Section 472 (meaning of “control”) applies for the purposes of section 375 and this section. (5) In section 375— “CIS-based close company” means a company which would not be a close company apart from the rights and powers of one or more partners in a CIS limited partnership being attributed to another of the partners under section 451(4) to (6) of CTA 2010 because of section 448(1)(a) of that Act, “CIS limited partnership” means a limited partnership— which is a collective investment scheme, or which would be a collective investment scheme if it were not a body corporate, “non-qualifying territory” has the meaning given by section 173 of TIOPA 2010, “resident for tax purposes” means liable, under the law of the non-qualifying territory, to tax there by reason of domicile, residence or place of management, and “small or medium-sized enterprise” has the meaning given by section 172 of TIOPA 2010. (6) For the purposes of section 375, a non-qualifying territory is “non-taxing” if companies are not under its law liable to tax by reason of domicile, residence or place of management.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds