Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

40B Professionals in practice: incidental income from an office or employment

(1) This section applies where— (a) a payment is received by an individual who carries on a profession in partnership, (b) the payment is made to the individual in his or her capacity as an employee or office-holder, but is not made in respect of employment as a director of a company, (c) the payment would otherwise be employment income of the individual chargeable to tax under Part 2 of ITEPA 2003, and (d) the conditions in subsection (3) are met. (2) The payment is to be treated for corporation tax purposes as a receipt of a trade carried on by the firm. (3) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(d) are that— (a) the time spent by the individual in performing the duties of the office or employment is insubstantial compared with the time spent by the individual in carrying on the profession, (b) the office or employment is related to the profession carried on by the individual, (c) the amount of the payment is insubstantial compared with so much of the total amount brought into account as receipts when calculating the firm’s profits as is attributable to the individual, and (d) the individual is required by the terms of the partnership agreement to account to the firm for the payment and does so.

Your change, as a redline

40B Professionals in practice: incidental income from an office or employment

(1) This section applies where— (a) a payment is received by an individual who carries on a profession in partnership, (b) the payment is made to the individual in his or her capacity as an employee or office-holder, but is not made in respect of employment as a director of a company, (c) the payment would otherwise be employment income of the individual chargeable to tax under Part 2 of ITEPA 2003, and (d) the conditions in subsection (3) are met. (2) The payment is to be treated for corporation tax purposes as a receipt of a trade carried on by the firm. (3) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(d) are that— (a) the time spent by the individual in performing the duties of the office or employment is insubstantial compared with the time spent by the individual in carrying on the profession, (b) the office or employment is related to the profession carried on by the individual, (c) the amount of the payment is insubstantial compared with so much of the total amount brought into account as receipts when calculating the firm’s profits as is attributable to the individual, and (d) the individual is required by the terms of the partnership agreement to account to the firm for the payment and does so.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds