Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

445 Disapplication of section 444 where Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 applies

(1) Section 444 does not apply in relation to credits or debits of a company if— (a) as a result of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (transfer pricing), the profits and losses of the company are to be calculated for tax purposes as if the arm's length provision to which those credits or debits would relate had been made or imposed instead of the actual provision to which they relate, or (b) those profits would be so calculated if the actual provision — (i) conferred a potential advantage in relation to United Kingdom taxation (within the meaning of that Part) on the company, and (ii) differed from the arm’s length provision. (2) Subsection (1) applies despite section 464 (amounts brought into account under this Part excluded from being otherwise brought into account), but is subject to— (a) section 340(7) (disapplication of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 where group member replaces another as party to loan), ... (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) For the way in which this Part applies where adjustments are made under Part 4 of TIOPA 2010, see section 446. (5) In this section “the actual provision” and “the arm's length provision” have the same meaning as in Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (see sections 149 and 151 of that Act).

Your change, as a redline

445 Disapplication of section 444 where Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 applies

(1) Section 444 does not apply in relation to credits or debits of a company if— (a) as a result of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (transfer pricing), the profits and losses of the company are to be calculated for tax purposes as if the arm's length provision to which those credits or debits would relate had been made or imposed instead of the actual provision to which they relate, or (b) those profits would be so calculated if the actual provision — (i) conferred a potential advantage in relation to United Kingdom taxation (within the meaning of that Part) on the company, and (ii) differed from the arm’s length provision. (2) Subsection (1) applies despite section 464 (amounts brought into account under this Part excluded from being otherwise brought into account), but is subject to— (a) section 340(7) (disapplication of Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 where group member replaces another as party to loan), ... (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) For the way in which this Part applies where adjustments are made under Part 4 of TIOPA 2010, see section 446. (5) In this section “the actual provision” and “the arm's length provision” have the same meaning as in Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (see sections 149 and 151 of that Act).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds