Propose a change

Corporation Tax Act 2009

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

625 Group member replacing another as party to derivative contract

(1) This section applies if— (a) there is a transaction within section 626(2) or a series of transactions within section 626(3), (b) as a result one of the companies involved (“the transferee”) directly or indirectly replaces the other (“the transferor”) as a party to a derivative contract. (2) The credits and debits to be brought into account in accordance with this Part in respect of the derivative contract are determined in accordance with subsections (3) to (5). (3) For the accounting period in which the transaction or, as the case may be, the first of the transactions takes place, the transferor is treated as having entered into that transaction for consideration of an amount equal to the notional carrying value of the contract (see subsection (6)). (4) For any accounting period in which the transferee is a party to the contract, it is treated as if it had acquired the contract for consideration of an amount equal to its notional carrying value. (5) If a discount arises in respect of the transaction or series of transactions, the consideration is increased for the purposes of subsection (3) (but not subsection (4)) by the amount of the discount. (6) For the purposes of this section— (a) “discount” has same meaning as in section 480 (relevant non-lending relationships involving discounts), and (b) the notional carrying value of a contract is the amount which would have been its tax-adjusted carrying value based on the accounts of the transferor if a period of account had ended immediately before the date when the transferor ceased to be a party to the contract. (7) Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (provision not at arm's length) does not apply in relation to the amounts in respect of which credits or debits are to be brought into account under this section. (8) This section is subject to sections 628 (transferor using fair value accounting) and 629 (tax avoidance).

Your change, as a redline

625 Group member replacing another as party to derivative contract

(1) This section applies if— (a) there is a transaction within section 626(2) or a series of transactions within section 626(3), (b) as a result one of the companies involved (“the transferee”) directly or indirectly replaces the other (“the transferor”) as a party to a derivative contract. (2) The credits and debits to be brought into account in accordance with this Part in respect of the derivative contract are determined in accordance with subsections (3) to (5). (3) For the accounting period in which the transaction or, as the case may be, the first of the transactions takes place, the transferor is treated as having entered into that transaction for consideration of an amount equal to the notional carrying value of the contract (see subsection (6)). (4) For any accounting period in which the transferee is a party to the contract, it is treated as if it had acquired the contract for consideration of an amount equal to its notional carrying value. (5) If a discount arises in respect of the transaction or series of transactions, the consideration is increased for the purposes of subsection (3) (but not subsection (4)) by the amount of the discount. (6) For the purposes of this section— (a) “discount” has same meaning as in section 480 (relevant non-lending relationships involving discounts), and (b) the notional carrying value of a contract is the amount which would have been its tax-adjusted carrying value based on the accounts of the transferor if a period of account had ended immediately before the date when the transferor ceased to be a party to the contract. (7) Part 4 of TIOPA 2010 (provision not at arm's length) does not apply in relation to the amounts in respect of which credits or debits are to be brought into account under this section. (8) This section is subject to sections 628 (transferor using fair value accounting) and 629 (tax avoidance).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds