RSA 79-D Discretionary Preservation Easements
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
79-D:3 Qualifying Structures.
I. Any owner of an historic agricultural structure who wishes to maintain the structure in a use consistent with the purposes of this chapter may apply to the governing body of the municipality in which the property is located to convey a discretionary preservation easement to the municipality. II. A discretionary preservation easement shall be considered to provide a demonstrated public benefit if it provides at least one of the following public benefits: (a) There is scenic enjoyment of the structure by the general public from a public way or from public waters. (b) The structure is historically important on a local, regional, state, or national level, either independently or within an historic district. (c) The structure's physical or aesthetic features contribute to the historic or cultural integrity of a property listed on or determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, state register of historic places, or locally designated historic district. III. In determining whether an historic agricultural structure demonstrates the necessary public benefit to qualify for a discretionary preservation easement, the governing body shall have reference to guidelines adopted by the advisory committee established under RSA 227-C:29. Source. 2002, 86:1, eff. July 2, 2002.
79-D:3 Qualifying Structures.
I. Any owner of an historic agricultural structure who wishes to maintain the structure in a use consistent with the purposes of this chapter may apply to the governing body of the municipality in which the property is located to convey a discretionary preservation easement to the municipality. II. A discretionary preservation easement shall be considered to provide a demonstrated public benefit if it provides at least one of the following public benefits: (a) There is scenic enjoyment of the structure by the general public from a public way or from public waters. (b) The structure is historically important on a local, regional, state, or national level, either independently or within an historic district. (c) The structure's physical or aesthetic features contribute to the historic or cultural integrity of a property listed on or determined eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, state register of historic places, or locally designated historic district. III. In determining whether an historic agricultural structure demonstrates the necessary public benefit to qualify for a discretionary preservation easement, the governing body shall have reference to guidelines adopted by the advisory committee established under RSA 227-C:29. Source. 2002, 86:1, eff. July 2, 2002.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.