Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

1215 Effect of lack of independence

(1) If at any time during his term of office a statutory auditor becomes prohibited from acting by section 1214(1), he must immediately— (a) resign his office (with immediate effect), and (b) give notice in writing to the audited person that he has resigned by reason of his lack of independence. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he acts as a statutory auditor in contravention of section 1214(1), or (b) he fails to give the notice mentioned in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) in accordance with that subsection. (3) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (2) is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum. (4) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he has been convicted of an offence under subsection (2)(a) or this subsection, and (b) he continues to act as a statutory auditor in contravention of section 1214(1) after the conviction. (5) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he has been convicted of an offence under subsection (2)(b) or this subsection, and (b) after the conviction, he continues to fail to give the notice mentioned in subsection (1)(b). (6) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) or (5) is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding one-tenth of the statutory maximumone-tenth of the greater of £5,000 or the amount corresponding to level 4 on the standard scale for summary offences for each day on which the act or the failure continues. (7) In proceedings against a person for an offence under this section it is a defence for him to show that he did not know and had no reason to believe that he was, or had become, prohibited from acting as statutory auditor of the audited person by section 1214(1).

Your change, as a redline

1215 Effect of lack of independence

(1) If at any time during his term of office a statutory auditor becomes prohibited from acting by section 1214(1), he must immediately— (a) resign his office (with immediate effect), and (b) give notice in writing to the audited person that he has resigned by reason of his lack of independence. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he acts as a statutory auditor in contravention of section 1214(1), or (b) he fails to give the notice mentioned in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) in accordance with that subsection. (3) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (2) is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum. (4) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he has been convicted of an offence under subsection (2)(a) or this subsection, and (b) he continues to act as a statutory auditor in contravention of section 1214(1) after the conviction. (5) A person is guilty of an offence if— (a) he has been convicted of an offence under subsection (2)(b) or this subsection, and (b) after the conviction, he continues to fail to give the notice mentioned in subsection (1)(b). (6) A person guilty of an offence under subsection (4) or (5) is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding one-tenth of the statutory maximumone-tenth of the greater of £5,000 or the amount corresponding to level 4 on the standard scale for summary offences for each day on which the act or the failure continues. (7) In proceedings against a person for an offence under this section it is a defence for him to show that he did not know and had no reason to believe that he was, or had become, prohibited from acting as statutory auditor of the audited person by section 1214(1).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds