Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

267 Application to continue proceedings as derivative proceedings

(1) This section applies where— (a) a company has raised proceedings, and (b) the proceedings are in respect of an act or omission which could be the basis for derivative proceedings. (2) A member of the company may apply to the court to be substituted for the company in the proceedings, and for the proceedings to continue in consequence as derivative proceedings, on the ground that— (a) the manner in which the company commenced or continued the proceedings amounts to an abuse of the process of the court, (b) the company has failed to prosecute the proceedings diligently, and (c) it is appropriate for the member to be substituted for the company in the proceedings. (3) If it appears to the court that the application and the evidence produced by the applicant in support of it do not disclose a prima facie case for granting it, the court— (a) must refuse the application, and (b) may make any consequential order it considers appropriate. (4) If the application is not refused under subsection (3)— (a) the applicant must serve the application on the company, (b) the court— (i) may make an order requiring evidence to be produced by the company, and (ii) may adjourn the proceedings on the application to enable the evidence to be obtained, and (c) the company is entitled to take part in the further proceedings on the application. (5) On hearing the application, the court may— (a) grant the application on such terms as it thinks fit, (b) refuse the application, or (c) adjourn the proceedings on the application and make such order as to further procedure as it thinks fit.

Your change, as a redline

267 Application to continue proceedings as derivative proceedings

(1) This section applies where— (a) a company has raised proceedings, and (b) the proceedings are in respect of an act or omission which could be the basis for derivative proceedings. (2) A member of the company may apply to the court to be substituted for the company in the proceedings, and for the proceedings to continue in consequence as derivative proceedings, on the ground that— (a) the manner in which the company commenced or continued the proceedings amounts to an abuse of the process of the court, (b) the company has failed to prosecute the proceedings diligently, and (c) it is appropriate for the member to be substituted for the company in the proceedings. (3) If it appears to the court that the application and the evidence produced by the applicant in support of it do not disclose a prima facie case for granting it, the court— (a) must refuse the application, and (b) may make any consequential order it considers appropriate. (4) If the application is not refused under subsection (3)— (a) the applicant must serve the application on the company, (b) the court— (i) may make an order requiring evidence to be produced by the company, and (ii) may adjourn the proceedings on the application to enable the evidence to be obtained, and (c) the company is entitled to take part in the further proceedings on the application. (5) On hearing the application, the court may— (a) grant the application on such terms as it thinks fit, (b) refuse the application, or (c) adjourn the proceedings on the application and make such order as to further procedure as it thinks fit.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds