Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

485 Appointment of auditors of private company: general

(1) An auditor or auditors of a private company must be appointed for each financial year of the company, unless the directors reasonably resolve otherwise on the ground that audited accounts are unlikely to be required. (2) For each financial year for which an auditor or auditors is or are to be appointed (other than the company's first financial year), the appointment must be made before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with— (a) the end of the time allowed for sending out copies of the company's annual accounts and reports for the previous financial year (see section 424), or (b) if earlier, the day on which copies of the company's annual accounts and reports for the previous financial year are sent out under section 423. This is the “period for appointing auditors”. (3) The directors may appoint an auditor or auditors of the company— (a) at any time before the company's first period for appointing auditors, (b) following a period during which the company (being exempt from audit) did not have any auditor, at any time before the company's next period for appointing auditors, or (c) to fill a casual vacancy in the office of auditor. (4) The members may appoint an auditor or auditors by ordinary resolution— (a) during a period for appointing auditors, (b) if the company should have appointed an auditor or auditors during a period for appointing auditors but failed to do so, or (c) where the directors had power to appoint under subsection (3) but have failed to make an appointment. (5) An auditor or auditors of a private company may only be appointed— (a) in accordance with this section, or (b) in accordance with section 486 or 486A (default power of Secretary of State). This is without prejudice to any deemed re-appointment under section 487.

Your change, as a redline

485 Appointment of auditors of private company: general

(1) An auditor or auditors of a private company must be appointed for each financial year of the company, unless the directors reasonably resolve otherwise on the ground that audited accounts are unlikely to be required. (2) For each financial year for which an auditor or auditors is or are to be appointed (other than the company's first financial year), the appointment must be made before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with— (a) the end of the time allowed for sending out copies of the company's annual accounts and reports for the previous financial year (see section 424), or (b) if earlier, the day on which copies of the company's annual accounts and reports for the previous financial year are sent out under section 423. This is the “period for appointing auditors”. (3) The directors may appoint an auditor or auditors of the company— (a) at any time before the company's first period for appointing auditors, (b) following a period during which the company (being exempt from audit) did not have any auditor, at any time before the company's next period for appointing auditors, or (c) to fill a casual vacancy in the office of auditor. (4) The members may appoint an auditor or auditors by ordinary resolution— (a) during a period for appointing auditors, (b) if the company should have appointed an auditor or auditors during a period for appointing auditors but failed to do so, or (c) where the directors had power to appoint under subsection (3) but have failed to make an appointment. (5) An auditor or auditors of a private company may only be appointed— (a) in accordance with this section, or (b) in accordance with section 486 or 486A (default power of Secretary of State). This is without prejudice to any deemed re-appointment under section 487.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds