Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

511A Public interest companies: application to court to remove auditor from office

(1) This section applies only to a public interest company. (2) The competent authority may apply to the court for an order removing an auditor of a company from office if the authority considers that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office. (3) The members of a company may apply to the court for an order removing an auditor of the company from office if the applicant or applicants consider that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office. (4) If the court is satisfied, on hearing an application under subsection (2), that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office, it may make an order removing the auditor from office. (5) If the court is satisfied, on hearing an application under subsection (3), that— (a) the applicants represent in total— (i) not less than 5% of the voting rights of all the members having a right to vote at a general meeting of the company, or (ii) not less than 5% in nominal value of the company’s share capital, and (b) there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office, the court may make an order removing the auditor from office. (6) For the purposes of this section, divergence of opinions on accounting treatments or audit procedures are not to be taken to be proper grounds for removing an auditor from office. (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

511A Public interest companies: application to court to remove auditor from office

(1) This section applies only to a public interest company. (2) The competent authority may apply to the court for an order removing an auditor of a company from office if the authority considers that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office. (3) The members of a company may apply to the court for an order removing an auditor of the company from office if the applicant or applicants consider that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office. (4) If the court is satisfied, on hearing an application under subsection (2), that there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office, it may make an order removing the auditor from office. (5) If the court is satisfied, on hearing an application under subsection (3), that— (a) the applicants represent in total— (i) not less than 5% of the voting rights of all the members having a right to vote at a general meeting of the company, or (ii) not less than 5% in nominal value of the company’s share capital, and (b) there are proper grounds for removing the auditor from office, the court may make an order removing the auditor from office. (6) For the purposes of this section, divergence of opinions on accounting treatments or audit procedures are not to be taken to be proper grounds for removing an auditor from office. (7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds