Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

520 Company's duties in relation to statement

(1) This section applies where a company receives from an auditor (“A”) who is ceasing to hold office a statement under section 519 except where— (a) the company is a non-public interest company, and (b) the statement includes a statement to the effect that A considers that none of the reasons for A's ceasing to hold office, and no matters (if any) connected with A's ceasing to hold office, need to be brought to the attention of members or creditors of the company (as required by section 519(3B)). (2) Where this section applies, the company must within 14 days of the receipt of the statement either— (a) send a copy of it to every person who under section 423 is entitled to be sent copies of the accounts, or (b) apply to the court. (3) If it applies to the court, the company must notify the auditor of the application. (4) If the court is satisfied that the auditor is using the provisions of section 519 to secure needless publicity for defamatory matter— (a) it shall direct that copies of the statement need not be sent out, and (b) it may further order the company's costs (in Scotland, expenses) on the application to be paid in whole or in part by the auditor, even if he is not a party to the application. The company must within 14 days of the court's decision send to the persons mentioned in subsection (2)(a) a statement setting out the effect of the order. (5) If no such direction is made the company must send copies of the statement to the persons mentioned in subsection (2)(a) within 14 days of the court's decision or, as the case may be, of the discontinuance of the proceedings. (6) In the event of default in complying with this section an offence is committed by every officer of the company who is in default. (7) In proceedings for such an offence it is a defence for the person charged to show that he took all reasonable steps and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence. (8) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum.

Your change, as a redline

520 Company's duties in relation to statement

(1) This section applies where a company receives from an auditor (“A”) who is ceasing to hold office a statement under section 519 except where— (a) the company is a non-public interest company, and (b) the statement includes a statement to the effect that A considers that none of the reasons for A's ceasing to hold office, and no matters (if any) connected with A's ceasing to hold office, need to be brought to the attention of members or creditors of the company (as required by section 519(3B)). (2) Where this section applies, the company must within 14 days of the receipt of the statement either— (a) send a copy of it to every person who under section 423 is entitled to be sent copies of the accounts, or (b) apply to the court. (3) If it applies to the court, the company must notify the auditor of the application. (4) If the court is satisfied that the auditor is using the provisions of section 519 to secure needless publicity for defamatory matter— (a) it shall direct that copies of the statement need not be sent out, and (b) it may further order the company's costs (in Scotland, expenses) on the application to be paid in whole or in part by the auditor, even if he is not a party to the application. The company must within 14 days of the court's decision send to the persons mentioned in subsection (2)(a) a statement setting out the effect of the order. (5) If no such direction is made the company must send copies of the statement to the persons mentioned in subsection (2)(a) within 14 days of the court's decision or, as the case may be, of the discontinuance of the proceedings. (6) In the event of default in complying with this section an offence is committed by every officer of the company who is in default. (7) In proceedings for such an offence it is a defence for the person charged to show that he took all reasonable steps and exercised all due diligence to avoid the commission of the offence. (8) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to a fine; (b) on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds