Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

527 Members' power to require website publication of audit concerns

(1) The members of a quoted company may require the company to publish on a website a statement setting out any matter relating to— (a) the audit of the company's accounts (including the auditor's report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the next accounts meeting, or (b) any circumstances connected with an auditor of the company ceasing to hold office since the previous accounts meeting, that the members propose to raise at the next accounts meeting of the company. (2) A company is required to do so once it has received requests to that effect from— (a) members representing at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the members who have a relevant right to vote (excluding any voting rights attached to any shares in the company held as treasury shares), or (b) at least 100 members who have a relevant right to vote and hold shares in the company on which there has been paid up an average sum, per member, of at least £100. See also section 153 (exercise of rights where shares held on behalf of others). (3) In subsection (2) a “relevant right to vote” means a right to vote at the accounts meeting. (4) A request— (a) may be sent to the company in hard copy or electronic form, (b) must identify the statement to which it relates, (c) must be authenticated by the person or persons making it, and (d) must be received by the company at least one week before the meeting to which it relates. (5) A quoted company is not required to place on a website a statement under this section if, on an application by the company or another person who claims to be aggrieved, the court is satisfied that the rights conferred by this section are being abused. (6) The court may order the members requesting website publication to pay the whole or part of the company's costs (in Scotland, expenses) on such an application, even if they are not parties to the application.

Your change, as a redline

527 Members' power to require website publication of audit concerns

(1) The members of a quoted company may require the company to publish on a website a statement setting out any matter relating to— (a) the audit of the company's accounts (including the auditor's report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the next accounts meeting, or (b) any circumstances connected with an auditor of the company ceasing to hold office since the previous accounts meeting, that the members propose to raise at the next accounts meeting of the company. (2) A company is required to do so once it has received requests to that effect from— (a) members representing at least 5% of the total voting rights of all the members who have a relevant right to vote (excluding any voting rights attached to any shares in the company held as treasury shares), or (b) at least 100 members who have a relevant right to vote and hold shares in the company on which there has been paid up an average sum, per member, of at least £100. See also section 153 (exercise of rights where shares held on behalf of others). (3) In subsection (2) a “relevant right to vote” means a right to vote at the accounts meeting. (4) A request— (a) may be sent to the company in hard copy or electronic form, (b) must identify the statement to which it relates, (c) must be authenticated by the person or persons making it, and (d) must be received by the company at least one week before the meeting to which it relates. (5) A quoted company is not required to place on a website a statement under this section if, on an application by the company or another person who claims to be aggrieved, the court is satisfied that the rights conferred by this section are being abused. (6) The court may order the members requesting website publication to pay the whole or part of the company's costs (in Scotland, expenses) on such an application, even if they are not parties to the application.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds