Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

73 Order requiring name to be changed

(1) If an application under section 69 is upheld, the adjudicator shall make an order— (a) requiring the respondent company to change its name to one that is not an offending name, and (b) requiring all the respondents— (i) to take all such steps as are within their power to make, or facilitate the making, of that change, and (ii) not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with a name that is an offending name. (2) An “offending name” means a name that, by reason of its similarity to the name associated with the applicant in which he claims goodwill, would be likely— (a) to be the subject of a direction under section 67 (power of Secretary of State to direct change of name), or (b) to give rise to a further application under section 69. (3) The order must specify a date by which the respondent company's name is to be changed and may be enforced— (a) in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, in the same way as an order of the High Court; (b) in Scotland, in the same way as a decree of the Court of Session. (4) If the respondent company's name is not changed in accordance with the order by the specified date, the adjudicator may determine a new name for the company. (5) If the adjudicator determines a new name for the respondent company he must give notice of his determination— (a) to the applicant, (b) to the respondents, and (c) to the registrar. (6) For the purposes of this section a company's name is changed when the change takes effect in accordance with section 81(1) (on the issue of the new certification of incorporation). (7) Where an order is made under subsection (1), the registrar may omit from the material on the register that is available for public inspection any mention of the name to which the order relates.

Your change, as a redline

73 Order requiring name to be changed

(1) If an application under section 69 is upheld, the adjudicator shall make an order— (a) requiring the respondent company to change its name to one that is not an offending name, and (b) requiring all the respondents— (i) to take all such steps as are within their power to make, or facilitate the making, of that change, and (ii) not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in another company being registered with a name that is an offending name. (2) An “offending name” means a name that, by reason of its similarity to the name associated with the applicant in which he claims goodwill, would be likely— (a) to be the subject of a direction under section 67 (power of Secretary of State to direct change of name), or (b) to give rise to a further application under section 69. (3) The order must specify a date by which the respondent company's name is to be changed and may be enforced— (a) in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, in the same way as an order of the High Court; (b) in Scotland, in the same way as a decree of the Court of Session. (4) If the respondent company's name is not changed in accordance with the order by the specified date, the adjudicator may determine a new name for the company. (5) If the adjudicator determines a new name for the respondent company he must give notice of his determination— (a) to the applicant, (b) to the respondents, and (c) to the registrar. (6) For the purposes of this section a company's name is changed when the change takes effect in accordance with section 81(1) (on the issue of the new certification of incorporation). (7) Where an order is made under subsection (1), the registrar may omit from the material on the register that is available for public inspection any mention of the name to which the order relates.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds