Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

839 Requirements where initial accounts used

(1) Initial accounts must be accounts that enable a reasonable judgment to be made as to the amounts of the items mentioned in section 836(1). (2) Where initial accounts are prepared for a proposed distribution by a public company, the following requirements apply. (3) The accounts must have been properly prepared, or have been so prepared subject to matters that are not material for determining (by reference to the items mentioned in section 836(1)) whether the distribution would contravene this Part. (4) “Properly prepared” means prepared in accordance with sections 395 to 397 (requirements for company individual accounts), applying those requirements with such modifications as are necessary because the accounts are prepared otherwise than in respect of an accounting reference period. (5) The company's auditor must have made a report stating whether, in his opinion, the accounts have been properly prepared. (6) If that report was qualified— (a) the auditor must have stated in writing (either at the time of his report or subsequently) whether in his opinion the matters in respect of which his report is qualified are material for determining whether a distribution would contravene this Part, and (b) a copy of that statement must have been laid before the company in general meeting. (7) A copy of the accounts, of the auditor's report and of any auditor's statement must have been delivered to the registrar. Any requirement of Part 35 of this Act as to the delivery of a certified translation into English of any of those documents must also have been met.

Your change, as a redline

839 Requirements where initial accounts used

(1) Initial accounts must be accounts that enable a reasonable judgment to be made as to the amounts of the items mentioned in section 836(1). (2) Where initial accounts are prepared for a proposed distribution by a public company, the following requirements apply. (3) The accounts must have been properly prepared, or have been so prepared subject to matters that are not material for determining (by reference to the items mentioned in section 836(1)) whether the distribution would contravene this Part. (4) “Properly prepared” means prepared in accordance with sections 395 to 397 (requirements for company individual accounts), applying those requirements with such modifications as are necessary because the accounts are prepared otherwise than in respect of an accounting reference period. (5) The company's auditor must have made a report stating whether, in his opinion, the accounts have been properly prepared. (6) If that report was qualified— (a) the auditor must have stated in writing (either at the time of his report or subsequently) whether in his opinion the matters in respect of which his report is qualified are material for determining whether a distribution would contravene this Part, and (b) a copy of that statement must have been laid before the company in general meeting. (7) A copy of the accounts, of the auditor's report and of any auditor's statement must have been delivered to the registrar. Any requirement of Part 35 of this Act as to the delivery of a certified translation into English of any of those documents must also have been met.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds