Propose a change

Companies Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

844 Treatment of development costs

(1) Where development costs are shown or included as an asset in a company's accounts, any amount shown or included in respect of those costs is treated— (a) for the purposes of section 830 (distributions to be made out of profits available for the purpose) as a realised loss, and (b) for the purposes of section 832 (distributions by investment companies out of accumulated revenue profits) as a realised revenue loss. This is subject to the following exceptions. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any part of that amount representing an unrealised profit made on revaluation of those costs. (3) Subsection (1) does not apply if— (a) there are special circumstances in the company's case justifying the directors in deciding that the amount there mentioned is not to be treated as required by subsection (1), (b) it is stated— (i) in the case of Companies Act accounts, in the note required by regulations under section 396 as to the reasons for showing development costs as an asset, or (ii) in the case of IAS accounts, in any note to the accounts, that the amount is not to be so treated, and (c) the note explains the circumstances relied upon to justify the decision of the directors to that effect.

Your change, as a redline

844 Treatment of development costs

(1) Where development costs are shown or included as an asset in a company's accounts, any amount shown or included in respect of those costs is treated— (a) for the purposes of section 830 (distributions to be made out of profits available for the purpose) as a realised loss, and (b) for the purposes of section 832 (distributions by investment companies out of accumulated revenue profits) as a realised revenue loss. This is subject to the following exceptions. (2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any part of that amount representing an unrealised profit made on revaluation of those costs. (3) Subsection (1) does not apply if— (a) there are special circumstances in the company's case justifying the directors in deciding that the amount there mentioned is not to be treated as required by subsection (1), (b) it is stated— (i) in the case of Companies Act accounts, in the note required by regulations under section 396 as to the reasons for showing development costs as an asset, or (ii) in the case of IAS accounts, in any note to the accounts, that the amount is not to be so treated, and (c) the note explains the circumstances relied upon to justify the decision of the directors to that effect.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds