Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
134 Cases in which grants may be re-calculated, withheld or repaid.
(1) Where an application for a grant has been approved by the local housingauthority, subsection (2) below applies in any case where—
(a) the eligible works are not completed to the satisfaction of the authoritywithin the period specified under subsection (2) of section 118 above, or suchextended period as they may allow under subsection (3) of that section; or
(b) the authority ascertain that the aggregate of the cost of completing theeligible works and the costs incurred with respect to preliminary or ancillaryservices and charges, is or is likely to be lower than the estimated expense;or
(c) the authority ascertain that without their knowledge the eligible workswere started before the application was approved and the application wasneither—
(i) one which they were required to approve by virtue of section 112 above ina case where completion of the relevant works was necessary to comply with anotice under section 189 of the Housing Act 1985 (repairnotice requiring works to render premises fit for human habitation); nor
(ii) one which they were required to approve by virtue of section 113 above.
(2) Where this subsection applies, the authority may—
(a) refuse to pay the grant or any further instalment of grant which remainsto be paid; or
(b) make a reduction in the grant which, in a case falling within subsection(1)(b) above, is to be a reduction proportionate to the reduction in theestimated expense;
and may demand repayment by the applicant forthwith, in whole or part,of the grant or any instalment of the grant paid, together with interest atsuch reasonable rate as the authority may determine from the date of paymentuntil repayment.
Your change, as a redline
134 Cases in which grants may be re-calculated, withheld or repaid.
(1) Where an application for a grant has been approved by the local housingauthority, subsection (2) below applies in any case where—
(a) the eligible works are not completed to the satisfaction of the authoritywithin the period specified under subsection (2) of section 118 above, or suchextended period as they may allow under subsection (3) of that section; or
(b) the authority ascertain that the aggregate of the cost of completing theeligible works and the costs incurred with respect to preliminary or ancillaryservices and charges, is or is likely to be lower than the estimated expense;or
(c) the authority ascertain that without their knowledge the eligible workswere started before the application was approved and the application wasneither—
(i) one which they were required to approve by virtue of section 112 above ina case where completion of the relevant works was necessary to comply with anotice under section 189 of the Housing Act 1985 (repairnotice requiring works to render premises fit for human habitation); nor
(ii) one which they were required to approve by virtue of section 113 above.
(2) Where this subsection applies, the authority may—
(a) refuse to pay the grant or any further instalment of grant which remainsto be paid; or
(b) make a reduction in the grant which, in a case falling within subsection(1)(b) above, is to be a reduction proportionate to the reduction in theestimated expense;
and may demand repayment by the applicant forthwith, in whole or part,of the grant or any instalment of the grant paid, together with interest atsuch reasonable rate as the authority may determine from the date of paymentuntil repayment.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.