Propose a change

Local Government and Housing Act 1989

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

159 Prevention of continuance or recurrence of default of local authority: Scotland.

(1) Section 211 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act1973 (provision for default of local authority) shall be amended in accordance with this section. (2) After subsection (2) there shall be inserted the following subsections— (2A) If the Secretary of State or appropriate Minister— (a) is about to make an order under subsection (2) above; and (b) is satisfied that the failure to which the order relates has continued or recurred, he may, in that order and without any local inquiry, declare theauthority to be in default in respect of the continuance or recurrence of the failure and direct them for the purpose of remedying the default to take such steps and within such time or times as may be specified in the order. (2B) The Secretary of State or appropriate Minister may, in an order undersubsection (2) above, notify the local authority that any continuance or recurrence of the failure in respect of which the authority have been declared to be in default happening after the date of the order may be made the subject of an application to the Court of Session under subsection (3A) below. (3) After subsection (3) there shall be inserted the following subsection— (3A) If— (a) a local authority have been notified under subsection (2B) above; and (b) there has been any such continuance or recurrence as is mentioned in that subsection of the failure to which the notification relates, the Court of Session may, on the application of the Lord Advocate onbehalf of the Secretary of State or appropriate Minister, order specific performance of the functions in respect of which there has been such continuance or recurrence of the failure and do otherwise as to the court appears to be just.

Your change, as a redline

159 Prevention of continuance or recurrence of default of local authority: Scotland.

(1) Section 211 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act1973 (provision for default of local authority) shall be amended in accordance with this section. (2) After subsection (2) there shall be inserted the following subsections— (2A) If the Secretary of State or appropriate Minister— (a) is about to make an order under subsection (2) above; and (b) is satisfied that the failure to which the order relates has continued or recurred, he may, in that order and without any local inquiry, declare theauthority to be in default in respect of the continuance or recurrence of the failure and direct them for the purpose of remedying the default to take such steps and within such time or times as may be specified in the order. (2B) The Secretary of State or appropriate Minister may, in an order undersubsection (2) above, notify the local authority that any continuance or recurrence of the failure in respect of which the authority have been declared to be in default happening after the date of the order may be made the subject of an application to the Court of Session under subsection (3A) below. (3) After subsection (3) there shall be inserted the following subsection— (3A) If— (a) a local authority have been notified under subsection (2B) above; and (b) there has been any such continuance or recurrence as is mentioned in that subsection of the failure to which the notification relates, the Court of Session may, on the application of the Lord Advocate onbehalf of the Secretary of State or appropriate Minister, order specific performance of the functions in respect of which there has been such continuance or recurrence of the failure and do otherwise as to the court appears to be just.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds