Justices of the Peace Act 1997 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
31 General powers and duties of magistrates’ courts committees.
(1) A magistrates’ courts committee shall be responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the magistrates’ courts for their area. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) It shall be the duty of every magistrates’ courts committee to provide training courses for justices’ clerks and for staff of the committee. (4) The Lord Chancellor may give directions to magistrates’ courts committees requiring each of them, in discharging their responsibilities under subsection (1) above, to meet specified standards of performance. (5) The Lord Chancellor may also give directions to magistrates’ courts committees requiring each of them to take specified steps, at such intervals as may be specified— (a) for the purpose of keeping the magistrates for their area informed as to the activities of the committee; or (b) for the purpose of ascertaining the views of those magistrates on particular matters related to the functions of the committee. (6) In discharging their responsibilities under subsection (1) above, a magistrates’ courts committee shall have regard to the needs of court users who are disabled; and so long as any direction under subsection (4) above is in force the standards of performance required under that subsection must include standards relating to the provision made for such court users. (7) A direction under this section may be given to all magistrates’ courts committees or to one or more particular committees. (8) The Lord Chancellor shall arrange for any direction given under this section to be published in such manner as he thinks fit.
31 General powers and duties of magistrates’ courts committees.
(1) A magistrates’ courts committee shall be responsible for the efficient and effective administration of the magistrates’ courts for their area. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) It shall be the duty of every magistrates’ courts committee to provide training courses for justices’ clerks and for staff of the committee. (4) The Lord Chancellor may give directions to magistrates’ courts committees requiring each of them, in discharging their responsibilities under subsection (1) above, to meet specified standards of performance. (5) The Lord Chancellor may also give directions to magistrates’ courts committees requiring each of them to take specified steps, at such intervals as may be specified— (a) for the purpose of keeping the magistrates for their area informed as to the activities of the committee; or (b) for the purpose of ascertaining the views of those magistrates on particular matters related to the functions of the committee. (6) In discharging their responsibilities under subsection (1) above, a magistrates’ courts committee shall have regard to the needs of court users who are disabled; and so long as any direction under subsection (4) above is in force the standards of performance required under that subsection must include standards relating to the provision made for such court users. (7) A direction under this section may be given to all magistrates’ courts committees or to one or more particular committees. (8) The Lord Chancellor shall arrange for any direction given under this section to be published in such manner as he thinks fit.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.