Judges Pensions (India and Burma) Act 1948 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Supplementary pensions to European I.C.S. judges of British India High Courts.
(1) The Secretary of State may grant a pension payable out of moneys provided by Parliament to any European who,— (a) was a member of the Indian Civil Service; and (b) was, immediately before the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, a judge of a Chartered High Court in British India other than that at Nagpur, and had not before that date gone on leave pending retirement; and (c) retires, either before or after the passing of this Act. (2) A pension under this section shall be at the annual rate of one pound seven shillings and nine and one-third pence for each completed month of service in a Chartered High Court, other than that at Nagpur: Provided that the annual amount of a pension under this section shall not exceed two hundred pounds.
2 Supplementary pensions to European I.C.S. judges of British India High Courts.
(1) The Secretary of State may grant a pension payable out of moneys provided by Parliament to any European who,— (a) was a member of the Indian Civil Service; and (b) was, immediately before the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, a judge of a Chartered High Court in British India other than that at Nagpur, and had not before that date gone on leave pending retirement; and (c) retires, either before or after the passing of this Act. (2) A pension under this section shall be at the annual rate of one pound seven shillings and nine and one-third pence for each completed month of service in a Chartered High Court, other than that at Nagpur: Provided that the annual amount of a pension under this section shall not exceed two hundred pounds.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.