Judges Pensions (India and Burma) Act 1948 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Other provisions as to pensions under this Act.
(1) Pensions granted under this Act shall be in addition to any lump sum grants made to the persons to whom the pensions are granted out of moneys provided by Parliament by way of compensation for loss of office. (2) Any pension granted under this Act shall be for the life of the person to whom it is granted. (3) Any pension granted under this Act to the last person who held the office of Chief Justice of India before the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, shall begin to accrue as from the date on which he ceased to be entitled to salary as chairman of the Arbitral Tribunal set up by the Arbitral Tribunal Order 1947, made by the Governor General of India under section nine of the Indian Independence Act 1947. (4) Any pension granted under this Act to any other person shall begin to accrue as from the date on which he ceased to be entitled to salary as a judge of a court in British India, India, Pakistan or Burma, as the case may be. (5) The Secretary of State may permit pensions granted under this Act to be commuted to the extent, in the circumstances and on the terms for the time being provided for by the appropriate India, Pakistan or Burma rules as respects the commutation of pensions payable out of any revenues of, or any part of, those countries respectively to persons who have been judges of High Courts or other similar courts, and any sum required to be paid by way of commutation of the whole or any part of any pension granted under this Act shall be paid out of moneys provided by Parliament. In this subsection, the expression “the appropriate India, Pakistan or Burma rules” means the rules prevailing under the law of India, of Pakistan or of Burma according as the last court (being the Federal Court or a court in British India, India, Pakistan or Burma) in which the person in question served as a judge is situate in the territories of India, Pakistan or Burma.
6 Other provisions as to pensions under this Act.
(1) Pensions granted under this Act shall be in addition to any lump sum grants made to the persons to whom the pensions are granted out of moneys provided by Parliament by way of compensation for loss of office. (2) Any pension granted under this Act shall be for the life of the person to whom it is granted. (3) Any pension granted under this Act to the last person who held the office of Chief Justice of India before the fifteenth day of August, nineteen hundred and forty-seven, shall begin to accrue as from the date on which he ceased to be entitled to salary as chairman of the Arbitral Tribunal set up by the Arbitral Tribunal Order 1947, made by the Governor General of India under section nine of the Indian Independence Act 1947. (4) Any pension granted under this Act to any other person shall begin to accrue as from the date on which he ceased to be entitled to salary as a judge of a court in British India, India, Pakistan or Burma, as the case may be. (5) The Secretary of State may permit pensions granted under this Act to be commuted to the extent, in the circumstances and on the terms for the time being provided for by the appropriate India, Pakistan or Burma rules as respects the commutation of pensions payable out of any revenues of, or any part of, those countries respectively to persons who have been judges of High Courts or other similar courts, and any sum required to be paid by way of commutation of the whole or any part of any pension granted under this Act shall be paid out of moneys provided by Parliament. In this subsection, the expression “the appropriate India, Pakistan or Burma rules” means the rules prevailing under the law of India, of Pakistan or of Burma according as the last court (being the Federal Court or a court in British India, India, Pakistan or Burma) in which the person in question served as a judge is situate in the territories of India, Pakistan or Burma.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.