Prisons (Interference with Wireless Telegraphy) Act 2012
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Safeguards
(1) Before the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1 it must be satisfied any equipment that will be used as a result of the authorisation is fit for the purpose. (2) Where the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1 it must inform the Office of Communications. (3) A person in charge of a relevant institution who is authorised to interfere with wireless telegraphy under section 1 must act in accordance with directions given under this section. (4) Where the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1, it must give directions to the person so authorised— (a) specifying descriptions of information to be provided to the Office of Communications; (b) specifying intervals at, or occurrences on, which such information is to be so provided; (c) as to the circumstances in which the use of equipment for the purposes of an interference with wireless telegraphy authorised under section 1 must be modified or discontinued (and, in particular, directions aimed at ensuring that the authorised interference will not result in disproportionate interference with wireless telegraphy outside the relevant institution). (5) The appropriate national authority may give such other directions to a person mentioned in subsection (4) as it considers necessary or desirable for the purposes of this Act. (6) A direction under this section must be in writing.
2 Safeguards
(1) Before the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1 it must be satisfied any equipment that will be used as a result of the authorisation is fit for the purpose. (2) Where the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1 it must inform the Office of Communications. (3) A person in charge of a relevant institution who is authorised to interfere with wireless telegraphy under section 1 must act in accordance with directions given under this section. (4) Where the appropriate national authority authorises an interference with wireless telegraphy under section 1, it must give directions to the person so authorised— (a) specifying descriptions of information to be provided to the Office of Communications; (b) specifying intervals at, or occurrences on, which such information is to be so provided; (c) as to the circumstances in which the use of equipment for the purposes of an interference with wireless telegraphy authorised under section 1 must be modified or discontinued (and, in particular, directions aimed at ensuring that the authorised interference will not result in disproportionate interference with wireless telegraphy outside the relevant institution). (5) The appropriate national authority may give such other directions to a person mentioned in subsection (4) as it considers necessary or desirable for the purposes of this Act. (6) A direction under this section must be in writing.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.