Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
33 Recovery of possession on termination of a short assured tenancy.
(1) Without prejudice to any right of the landlord under a short assured tenancy to recover possession of the house let on the tenancy in accordance with sections 12 to 31 of this Act, the First-tier Tribunal may make an order for possession of the house if the Tribunal is satisfied—
(a) that the short assured tenancy has reached its finish;
(b) that tacit relocation is not operating; ...
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) that the landlord (or, where there are joint landlords, any of them) has given to the tenant notice stating that he requires possession of the house , and
(e) that it is reasonable to make an order for possession.
(2) The period of notice to be given under subsection (1)(d) above shall be—
(i) if the terms of the tenancy provide, in relation to such notice, for a period of more than two months, that period;
(ii) in any other case, two months.
(3) A notice under paragraph (d) of subsection (1) above may be served before, at or after the termination of the tenancy to which it relates.
(4) Where the First-tier Tribunal makes an order for possession of a house by virtue of subsection (1) above, any statutory assured tenancy which has arisen as at that finish shall end (without further notice) on the day on which the order takes effect.
(5) For the avoidance of doubt, sections 18 and 19 do not apply for the purpose of a landlord seeking to recover possession of the house under this section.
Your change, as a redline
33 Recovery of possession on termination of a short assured tenancy.
(1) Without prejudice to any right of the landlord under a short assured tenancy to recover possession of the house let on the tenancy in accordance with sections 12 to 31 of this Act, the First-tier Tribunal may make an order for possession of the house if the Tribunal is satisfied—
(a) that the short assured tenancy has reached its finish;
(b) that tacit relocation is not operating; ...
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) that the landlord (or, where there are joint landlords, any of them) has given to the tenant notice stating that he requires possession of the house , and
(e) that it is reasonable to make an order for possession.
(2) The period of notice to be given under subsection (1)(d) above shall be—
(i) if the terms of the tenancy provide, in relation to such notice, for a period of more than two months, that period;
(ii) in any other case, two months.
(3) A notice under paragraph (d) of subsection (1) above may be served before, at or after the termination of the tenancy to which it relates.
(4) Where the First-tier Tribunal makes an order for possession of a house by virtue of subsection (1) above, any statutory assured tenancy which has arisen as at that finish shall end (without further notice) on the day on which the order takes effect.
(5) For the avoidance of doubt, sections 18 and 19 do not apply for the purpose of a landlord seeking to recover possession of the house under this section.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.