Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Reasonable care
(1) Whether or not a consumer has taken reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation is to be determined in the light of all the relevant circumstances. (2) The following are examples of things which may need to be taken into account in making a determination under subsection (1)— (a) the type of consumer insurance contract in question, and its target market, (b) any relevant explanatory material or publicity produced or authorised by the insurer, (c) how clear, and how specific, the insurer's questions were, (d) in the case of a failure to respond to the insurer's questions in connection with the renewal or variation of a consumer insurance contract, how clearly the insurer communicated the importance of answering those questions (or the possible consequences of failing to do so), (e) whether or not an agent was acting for the consumer. (3) The standard of care required is that of a reasonable consumer: but this is subject to subsections (4) and (5). (4) If the insurer was, or ought to have been, aware of any particular characteristics or circumstances of the actual consumer, those are to be taken into account. (5) A misrepresentation made dishonestly is always to be taken as showing lack of reasonable care.
3 Reasonable care
(1) Whether or not a consumer has taken reasonable care not to make a misrepresentation is to be determined in the light of all the relevant circumstances. (2) The following are examples of things which may need to be taken into account in making a determination under subsection (1)— (a) the type of consumer insurance contract in question, and its target market, (b) any relevant explanatory material or publicity produced or authorised by the insurer, (c) how clear, and how specific, the insurer's questions were, (d) in the case of a failure to respond to the insurer's questions in connection with the renewal or variation of a consumer insurance contract, how clearly the insurer communicated the importance of answering those questions (or the possible consequences of failing to do so), (e) whether or not an agent was acting for the consumer. (3) The standard of care required is that of a reasonable consumer: but this is subject to subsections (4) and (5). (4) If the insurer was, or ought to have been, aware of any particular characteristics or circumstances of the actual consumer, those are to be taken into account. (5) A misrepresentation made dishonestly is always to be taken as showing lack of reasonable care.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.