The Single Source Contract (Amendment) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendment to regulation 11 of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014
(1) Regulation 11 (steps in determining contract profit rate) of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014 is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (6)— (a) after “component specified by the Secretary of State”, insert “(the relevant provisions)”; (b) for “two percentage points”, substitute “ten percentage points”. (3) After paragraph (6), insert— (6A) In specifying the relevant provisions, the Secretary of State must also specify an outcome that must be achieved in order for the incentive adjustment to be payable, and that outcome must— (a) be capable of objective verification; and (b) relate to the performance of the relevant provisions. (6B) If assessing the outcome or the performance of the relevant provisions includes any element of judgement by one or both of the contracting parties, or any person associated with the primary contractor, that element must be capable of being determined by a suitably qualified independent person. (6C) In determining the amount of the incentive adjustment, the Secretary of State must be satisfied that it is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to the potential public benefit arising from its use. .
2 Amendment to regulation 11 of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014
(1) Regulation 11 (steps in determining contract profit rate) of the Single Source Contract Regulations 2014 is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph (6)— (a) after “component specified by the Secretary of State”, insert “(the relevant provisions)”; (b) for “two percentage points”, substitute “ten percentage points”. (3) After paragraph (6), insert— (6A) In specifying the relevant provisions, the Secretary of State must also specify an outcome that must be achieved in order for the incentive adjustment to be payable, and that outcome must— (a) be capable of objective verification; and (b) relate to the performance of the relevant provisions. (6B) If assessing the outcome or the performance of the relevant provisions includes any element of judgement by one or both of the contracting parties, or any person associated with the primary contractor, that element must be capable of being determined by a suitably qualified independent person. (6C) In determining the amount of the incentive adjustment, the Secretary of State must be satisfied that it is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to the potential public benefit arising from its use. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.