The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments (Protection Measures) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Jurisdiction in relation to incoming protection measures
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In Schedule 1 to the Senior Courts Act 1981, in paragraph 3 (Family Division), at the end insert— (l) proceedings under Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters, so far as relating to the recognition and enforcement in England and Wales of a protection measure (within the meaning of that Regulation) ordered in a Member State other than the United Kingdom. . (4) Except where an appeal may be brought under section 44 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978, an appeal against a decision made under the Protection Measures Regulation by a court in Northern Ireland (“the decision”) must be brought in— (a) the High Court, where the decision was made by a county court; (b) a county court, where the decision was made by a court of summary jurisdiction. (5) An appeal to the High Court by virtue of paragraph (4) is brought as if the decision had been made in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by Part III of the County Courts (Northern Ireland) Order1980, and Article 60 of that Order applies accordingly. (6) On an appeal by virtue of paragraph (4), the appellate court may make— (a) any order which is necessary to give effect to its determination of the appeal; and (b) any incidental or consequential order as appears to it to be just.
3 Jurisdiction in relation to incoming protection measures
(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In Schedule 1 to the Senior Courts Act 1981, in paragraph 3 (Family Division), at the end insert— (l) proceedings under Regulation (EU) No 606/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters, so far as relating to the recognition and enforcement in England and Wales of a protection measure (within the meaning of that Regulation) ordered in a Member State other than the United Kingdom. . (4) Except where an appeal may be brought under section 44 of the Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978, an appeal against a decision made under the Protection Measures Regulation by a court in Northern Ireland (“the decision”) must be brought in— (a) the High Court, where the decision was made by a county court; (b) a county court, where the decision was made by a court of summary jurisdiction. (5) An appeal to the High Court by virtue of paragraph (4) is brought as if the decision had been made in the exercise of the jurisdiction conferred by Part III of the County Courts (Northern Ireland) Order1980, and Article 60 of that Order applies accordingly. (6) On an appeal by virtue of paragraph (4), the appellate court may make— (a) any order which is necessary to give effect to its determination of the appeal; and (b) any incidental or consequential order as appears to it to be just.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.