The Employment Appeal Tribunal (Amendment) (No. 2) Rules 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendments to the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993
(1) The Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 3 (institution of appeal)— (a) in paragraph (1)(d)— (i) after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”; (ii) before “declaration”, in both places it occurs, insert “determination,”; (b) in paragraph (3)(d)— (i) before “declaration”, in both places it occurs, insert “determination,”; (ii) after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (3) In rule 4(1)(e) (service of notice of appeal), after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (4) In rule 5(c) (respondents to appeals)— (a) after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”; (b) after “from a” insert “determination,”. (5) In rule 6(2) (respondent’s answer and notice of cross-appeal), after “decision,” insert “determination,”. (6) In rule 7(1)(e) (disposal of appeal)— (a) after “from a” insert “determination,”; (b) after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (7) In rule 31(d) (drawing up, reasons for, and enforcement of orders), after “made under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (8) In the Schedule, in Form 1A— (a) in the heading, after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992,”; (b) in paragraph 3, after “decision,” insert “determination,”; (c) in paragraph 5, after “decision,” insert “determination,”; (d) in paragraph 6, after “law” insert “or erred in making the order under section 70ZI(5)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992”.
2 Amendments to the Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993
(1) The Employment Appeal Tribunal Rules 1993 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 3 (institution of appeal)— (a) in paragraph (1)(d)— (i) after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”; (ii) before “declaration”, in both places it occurs, insert “determination,”; (b) in paragraph (3)(d)— (i) before “declaration”, in both places it occurs, insert “determination,”; (ii) after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (3) In rule 4(1)(e) (service of notice of appeal), after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (4) In rule 5(c) (respondents to appeals)— (a) after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”; (b) after “from a” insert “determination,”. (5) In rule 6(2) (respondent’s answer and notice of cross-appeal), after “decision,” insert “determination,”. (6) In rule 7(1)(e) (disposal of appeal)— (a) after “from a” insert “determination,”; (b) after “the CAC under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (7) In rule 31(d) (drawing up, reasons for, and enforcement of orders), after “made under” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the 1992 Act or”. (8) In the Schedule, in Form 1A— (a) in the heading, after “pursuant to” insert “section 70ZM(1) or (2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992,”; (b) in paragraph 3, after “decision,” insert “determination,”; (c) in paragraph 5, after “decision,” insert “determination,”; (d) in paragraph 6, after “law” insert “or erred in making the order under section 70ZI(5)(b) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.