The Police and Crime Commissioner Elections (Amendment) Order 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Variation of limitation of candidate election expenses
In article 35(2) of the Police and Crime Commissioner Elections Order 2012, in Table 2— (a) in the entry for Avon & Somerset, for “£222,851” substitute “£305,130”; (b) in the entry for Bedfordshire, for “£83,681” substitute “£114,570”; (c) in the entry for Cambridgeshire, for “£108,754” substitute “£148,910”; (d) in the entry for Cheshire, for “£142,720” substitute “£195,410”; (e) in the entry for Cleveland, for “£76,889” substitute “£105,280”; (f) in the entry for Cumbria, for “£72,231” substitute “£98,900”; (g) in the entry for Derbyshire, for “£141,933” substitute “£194,340”; (h) in the entry for Devon and Cornwall, for “£233,281” substitute “£319,410”; (i) in the entry for Dorset, for “£106,888” substitute “£146,350”; (j) in the entry for Durham, for “£89,055” substitute “£121,930”; (k) in the entry for Dyfed-Powys, for “£72,622” substitute “£99,430”; (l) in the entry for Essex, for “£234,412” substitute “£320,960”; (m) in the entry for Gloucestershire, for “£86,344” substitute “£118,220”; (n) in the entry for Gwent, for “£78,422” substitute “£107,370”; (o) in the entry for Hampshire, for “£260,591” substitute “£356,810”; (p) in the entry for Hertfordshire, for “£151,378” substitute “£207,270”; (q) in the entry for Humberside, for “£126,520” substitute “£173,230”; (r) in the entry for Kent, for “£228,338” substitute “£312,650”; (s) in the entry for Lancashire, for “£201,729” substitute “£276,210”; (t) in the entry for Leicestershire, for “£140,496” substitute “£192,370”; (u) in the entry for Lincolnshire, for “£99,900” substitute “£136,780”; (v) in the entry for Merseyside, for “£182,529” substitute “£249,920”; (w) in the entry for Norfolk, for “£120,662” substitute “£165,210”; (x) in the entry for North Wales, for “£95,241” substitute “£130,400”; (y) in the entry for North Yorkshire, for “£111,814” substitute “£153,100”; (z) in the entry for Northamptonshire, for “£95,663” substitute “£130,980”; (aa) in the entry for Northumbria, for “£195,548” substitute “£267,750”; (bb) in the entry for Nottinghamshire, for “£146,305” substitute “£200,320”; (cc) in the entry for South Wales, for “£174,179” substitute “£238,490”; (dd) in the entry for South Yorkshire, for “£178,637” substitute “£244,590”; (ee) in the entry for Staffordshire, for “£153,313” substitute “£209,920”; (ff) in the entry for Suffolk, for “£100,698” substitute “£137,880”; (gg) in the entry for Surrey, for “£154,401” substitute “£211,410”; (hh) in the entry for Sussex, for “£219,983” substitute “£301,210”; (ii) in the entry for Thames Valley, for “£303,303” substitute “£415,290”; (jj) in the entry for Warwickshire, for “£76,476” substitute “£104,710”; (kk) in the entry for West Mercia, for “£168,735” substitute “£231,030”; (ll) in the entry for West Midlands, for “£357,435” substitute “£489,410”; (mm) in the entry for Wiltshire, for “£93,682” substitute “£128,270”.
2 Variation of limitation of candidate election expenses
In article 35(2) of the Police and Crime Commissioner Elections Order 2012, in Table 2— (a) in the entry for Avon & Somerset, for “£222,851” substitute “£305,130”; (b) in the entry for Bedfordshire, for “£83,681” substitute “£114,570”; (c) in the entry for Cambridgeshire, for “£108,754” substitute “£148,910”; (d) in the entry for Cheshire, for “£142,720” substitute “£195,410”; (e) in the entry for Cleveland, for “£76,889” substitute “£105,280”; (f) in the entry for Cumbria, for “£72,231” substitute “£98,900”; (g) in the entry for Derbyshire, for “£141,933” substitute “£194,340”; (h) in the entry for Devon and Cornwall, for “£233,281” substitute “£319,410”; (i) in the entry for Dorset, for “£106,888” substitute “£146,350”; (j) in the entry for Durham, for “£89,055” substitute “£121,930”; (k) in the entry for Dyfed-Powys, for “£72,622” substitute “£99,430”; (l) in the entry for Essex, for “£234,412” substitute “£320,960”; (m) in the entry for Gloucestershire, for “£86,344” substitute “£118,220”; (n) in the entry for Gwent, for “£78,422” substitute “£107,370”; (o) in the entry for Hampshire, for “£260,591” substitute “£356,810”; (p) in the entry for Hertfordshire, for “£151,378” substitute “£207,270”; (q) in the entry for Humberside, for “£126,520” substitute “£173,230”; (r) in the entry for Kent, for “£228,338” substitute “£312,650”; (s) in the entry for Lancashire, for “£201,729” substitute “£276,210”; (t) in the entry for Leicestershire, for “£140,496” substitute “£192,370”; (u) in the entry for Lincolnshire, for “£99,900” substitute “£136,780”; (v) in the entry for Merseyside, for “£182,529” substitute “£249,920”; (w) in the entry for Norfolk, for “£120,662” substitute “£165,210”; (x) in the entry for North Wales, for “£95,241” substitute “£130,400”; (y) in the entry for North Yorkshire, for “£111,814” substitute “£153,100”; (z) in the entry for Northamptonshire, for “£95,663” substitute “£130,980”; (aa) in the entry for Northumbria, for “£195,548” substitute “£267,750”; (bb) in the entry for Nottinghamshire, for “£146,305” substitute “£200,320”; (cc) in the entry for South Wales, for “£174,179” substitute “£238,490”; (dd) in the entry for South Yorkshire, for “£178,637” substitute “£244,590”; (ee) in the entry for Staffordshire, for “£153,313” substitute “£209,920”; (ff) in the entry for Suffolk, for “£100,698” substitute “£137,880”; (gg) in the entry for Surrey, for “£154,401” substitute “£211,410”; (hh) in the entry for Sussex, for “£219,983” substitute “£301,210”; (ii) in the entry for Thames Valley, for “£303,303” substitute “£415,290”; (jj) in the entry for Warwickshire, for “£76,476” substitute “£104,710”; (kk) in the entry for West Mercia, for “£168,735” substitute “£231,030”; (ll) in the entry for West Midlands, for “£357,435” substitute “£489,410”; (mm) in the entry for Wiltshire, for “£93,682” substitute “£128,270”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.