Tax Credits Act 2002
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
66 Parliamentary etc. control of instruments
(1) No order or regulations to which this subsection applies may be made unless a draft of the instrument containing the order or regulations (whether or not together with other provisions) has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament. (2) Subsection (1) applies to— (za) an order made by the Treasury under section 36A(8) or 36C(9), (zb) regulations made under section 36A(5) or 36C(4), (a) regulations prescribing monetary amounts that are required to be reviewed under section 41, (b) regulations made by virtue of subsection (2) of section 12 prescribing the amount in excess of which charges are not taken into account for the purposes of that subsection, and (c) the first regulations made under sections 7(8) and (9), 9, 11, 12 and 13(2). (3) A statutory instrument containing— (a) an order or regulations under this Act, (b) a scheme made by the Secretary of State under section 12(5), or (c) an Order in Council under section 52(7), is (unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament) subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (4) A statutory instrument containing a scheme made by the Scottish Ministers under section 12(5) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of the Scottish Parliament. (5) A statutory rule containing a scheme made by the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety under section 12(5) is subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 (c. 33 (N.I.)).
66 Parliamentary etc. control of instruments
(1) No order or regulations to which this subsection applies may be made unless a draft of the instrument containing the order or regulations (whether or not together with other provisions) has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament. (2) Subsection (1) applies to— (za) an order made by the Treasury under section 36A(8) or 36C(9), (zb) regulations made under section 36A(5) or 36C(4), (a) regulations prescribing monetary amounts that are required to be reviewed under section 41, (b) regulations made by virtue of subsection (2) of section 12 prescribing the amount in excess of which charges are not taken into account for the purposes of that subsection, and (c) the first regulations made under sections 7(8) and (9), 9, 11, 12 and 13(2). (3) A statutory instrument containing— (a) an order or regulations under this Act, (b) a scheme made by the Secretary of State under section 12(5), or (c) an Order in Council under section 52(7), is (unless a draft of the instrument has been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, each House of Parliament) subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of either House of Parliament. (4) A statutory instrument containing a scheme made by the Scottish Ministers under section 12(5) is subject to annulment in pursuance of a resolution of the Scottish Parliament. (5) A statutory rule containing a scheme made by the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety under section 12(5) is subject to negative resolution within the meaning of section 41(6) of the Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 (c. 33 (N.I.)).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.