Finance Act 2019
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
19 Hybrid and other mismatches: scope of Chapter 8 and “financial instrument”
(1) Part 6A of TIOPA 2010 (hybrid and other mismatches) is amended as follows. (2) In section 259HA (circumstances in which Chapter 8 applies)— (a) for subsection (5) substitute— (5) Condition C is that— (a) the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period, or (b) the multinational company— (i) is UK resident for the payment period, and (ii) under the law of the parent jurisdiction, is regarded as carrying on a business in the PE jurisdiction through a permanent establishment in that territory but, under the law of the PE jurisdiction, is not regarded as doing so. , and (b) in subsection (9)(a), for “company” substitute “ payee ”. (3) For section 259HC (counteraction of the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch) substitute— Counteraction of the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch 259HC For corporation tax purposes— (a) if paragraph (b) of Condition C in subsection (5) of section 259HA is met, an amount equal to the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch mentioned in subsection (6) of that section is to be treated as income arising to the multinational company in the United Kingdom (and nowhere else) for the payment period, and (b) in any other case, the relevant deduction that may be deducted from the payer's income for that period is to be reduced by that amount. (4) In section 259N (meaning of “financial instrument”)— (a) in subsection (3), for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) anything of a description specified in regulations made by the Treasury. , and (b) omit subsection (4). (5) The amendments made by subsections (2)(a) and (3) have effect in relation to— (a) payments made on or after 1 January 2020, and (b) quasi-payments in relation to which the payment period begins on or after that date. (6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(b), where a payment period begins before 1 January 2020 and ends after that date (“the straddling period”)— (a) so much of the straddling period as falls before that date, and so much of it as falls on or after that date, are to be treated as separate taxable periods, and (b) if it is necessary to apportion an amount for the straddling period to the two separate taxable periods, it is to be apportioned— (i) on a time basis according to the respective length of the separate taxable periods, or (ii) if that would produce a result that is unjust or unreasonable, on a just and reasonable basis. (7) The amendment made by subsection (2)(b) is to be regarded as always having had effect. (8) The first regulations under section 259N(3)(b) may have effect in relation to times before they come into force, but not times before 1 January 2019. (9) Until those regulations come into force section 259N continues to have effect (other than for the purposes of making those regulations) as if— (a) the amendments made by subsection (4) had not been made, and (b) the Taxation of Regulatory Capital Securities Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/3209) had not been revoked by paragraph 1 of Schedule 20 to this Act.
19 Hybrid and other mismatches: scope of Chapter 8 and “financial instrument”
(1) Part 6A of TIOPA 2010 (hybrid and other mismatches) is amended as follows. (2) In section 259HA (circumstances in which Chapter 8 applies)— (a) for subsection (5) substitute— (5) Condition C is that— (a) the payer is within the charge to corporation tax for the payment period, or (b) the multinational company— (i) is UK resident for the payment period, and (ii) under the law of the parent jurisdiction, is regarded as carrying on a business in the PE jurisdiction through a permanent establishment in that territory but, under the law of the PE jurisdiction, is not regarded as doing so. , and (b) in subsection (9)(a), for “company” substitute “ payee ”. (3) For section 259HC (counteraction of the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch) substitute— Counteraction of the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch 259HC For corporation tax purposes— (a) if paragraph (b) of Condition C in subsection (5) of section 259HA is met, an amount equal to the multinational payee deduction/non-inclusion mismatch mentioned in subsection (6) of that section is to be treated as income arising to the multinational company in the United Kingdom (and nowhere else) for the payment period, and (b) in any other case, the relevant deduction that may be deducted from the payer's income for that period is to be reduced by that amount. (4) In section 259N (meaning of “financial instrument”)— (a) in subsection (3), for paragraph (b) substitute— (b) anything of a description specified in regulations made by the Treasury. , and (b) omit subsection (4). (5) The amendments made by subsections (2)(a) and (3) have effect in relation to— (a) payments made on or after 1 January 2020, and (b) quasi-payments in relation to which the payment period begins on or after that date. (6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(b), where a payment period begins before 1 January 2020 and ends after that date (“the straddling period”)— (a) so much of the straddling period as falls before that date, and so much of it as falls on or after that date, are to be treated as separate taxable periods, and (b) if it is necessary to apportion an amount for the straddling period to the two separate taxable periods, it is to be apportioned— (i) on a time basis according to the respective length of the separate taxable periods, or (ii) if that would produce a result that is unjust or unreasonable, on a just and reasonable basis. (7) The amendment made by subsection (2)(b) is to be regarded as always having had effect. (8) The first regulations under section 259N(3)(b) may have effect in relation to times before they come into force, but not times before 1 January 2019. (9) Until those regulations come into force section 259N continues to have effect (other than for the purposes of making those regulations) as if— (a) the amendments made by subsection (4) had not been made, and (b) the Taxation of Regulatory Capital Securities Regulations 2013 (S.I. 2013/3209) had not been revoked by paragraph 1 of Schedule 20 to this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.