Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
22A Examination stations
(1) In this Act, references to an examination station are to—
(a) a part of, or a place at, a regulated aerodrome approved under section 22 above; ...
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1A) Any person contravening or failing to comply with any condition imposed under regulations under section 22(1A) attaching to an approval by virtue of which a part of, or a place at, a regulated aerodrome is an examination station is liable on summary conviction to—
(a) a penalty not exceeding £20,000, or
(b) if the contravention or failure to comply is not remedied before such date as is specified in a notice or further notice given to the person by an officer of Revenue and Customs, a penalty not exceeding the sum of £20,000 and the enhanced amount.
(1B) For the purposes of subsection (1A)(b)—
(a) “the enhanced amount” means the sum produced by multiplying £20,000 by the number of notices in respect of which the contravention or failure to comply has not been remedied by the date specified in the notice,
(b) the date specified in a notice must be one that falls after the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the notice is given, and
(c) if a notice has already been given, a further notice may not be given on or before the date specified in any earlier notice.
(2) Any person contravening or failing to comply with any condition or restriction attaching to an approval by virtue of which a part of, or place at, a regulated aerodrome is an examination station (other than a condition imposed under regulations under section 22(1A)) shall be liable on summary conviction to a penalty of level 3 on the standard scale.
Your change, as a redline
22A Examination stations
(1) In this Act, references to an examination station are to—
(a) a part of, or a place at, a regulated aerodrome approved under section 22 above; ...
(b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1A) Any person contravening or failing to comply with any condition imposed under regulations under section 22(1A) attaching to an approval by virtue of which a part of, or a place at, a regulated aerodrome is an examination station is liable on summary conviction to—
(a) a penalty not exceeding £20,000, or
(b) if the contravention or failure to comply is not remedied before such date as is specified in a notice or further notice given to the person by an officer of Revenue and Customs, a penalty not exceeding the sum of £20,000 and the enhanced amount.
(1B) For the purposes of subsection (1A)(b)—
(a) “the enhanced amount” means the sum produced by multiplying £20,000 by the number of notices in respect of which the contravention or failure to comply has not been remedied by the date specified in the notice,
(b) the date specified in a notice must be one that falls after the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the day on which the notice is given, and
(c) if a notice has already been given, a further notice may not be given on or before the date specified in any earlier notice.
(2) Any person contravening or failing to comply with any condition or restriction attaching to an approval by virtue of which a part of, or place at, a regulated aerodrome is an examination station (other than a condition imposed under regulations under section 22(1A)) shall be liable on summary conviction to a penalty of level 3 on the standard scale.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.