Propose a change

The Electricity Capacity Regulations 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

76 Determination of disputes

(1) After receiving a disputes notice which complies with regulation 75(2), the Settlement Body must, subject to paragraph (2), review the disputed calculation or determination, and decide whether to uphold it or to substitute a different calculation or determination. (2) The Settlement Body may, to assist in determining a dispute, appoint an independent person to consider the matter in dispute and provide a report on the matter, or an audit of any disputed calculation. (3) The Settlement Body must, as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving a disputes notice, give notice to the disputing party whether it— (a) is considering the disputed matter; (b) has appointed an independent person to consider the disputed matter under paragraph (2); or (c) has rejected the disputes notice on the ground that it does not comply with regulation 75(2). (4) The Settlement Body must determine a dispute— (a) where it commissions a report or audit under paragraph (2), not later than 28 days after receiving the report or audit; and (b) in any other case, not later than 28 days after receiving the disputes notice. (5) The Settlement Body must as soon as reasonably practicable after determining a dispute give a notice to the disputing party of its decision and the reason for that decision. (6) The references in this regulation to “an independent person” include a panel of persons, either— (a) established under an industry code; or (b) appointed by the Settlement Body for the purpose of considering disputes under this Chapter, provided that all the panel members who consider the dispute are independent from the Settlement Body and the disputing party.

Your change, as a redline

76 Determination of disputes

(1) After receiving a disputes notice which complies with regulation 75(2), the Settlement Body must, subject to paragraph (2), review the disputed calculation or determination, and decide whether to uphold it or to substitute a different calculation or determination. (2) The Settlement Body may, to assist in determining a dispute, appoint an independent person to consider the matter in dispute and provide a report on the matter, or an audit of any disputed calculation. (3) The Settlement Body must, as soon as reasonably practicable after receiving a disputes notice, give notice to the disputing party whether it— (a) is considering the disputed matter; (b) has appointed an independent person to consider the disputed matter under paragraph (2); or (c) has rejected the disputes notice on the ground that it does not comply with regulation 75(2). (4) The Settlement Body must determine a dispute— (a) where it commissions a report or audit under paragraph (2), not later than 28 days after receiving the report or audit; and (b) in any other case, not later than 28 days after receiving the disputes notice. (5) The Settlement Body must as soon as reasonably practicable after determining a dispute give a notice to the disputing party of its decision and the reason for that decision. (6) The references in this regulation to “an independent person” include a panel of persons, either— (a) established under an industry code; or (b) appointed by the Settlement Body for the purpose of considering disputes under this Chapter, provided that all the panel members who consider the dispute are independent from the Settlement Body and the disputing party.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds