Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1991 (repealed 25.8.1996)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
48A Re-assessment of whether defendant has benefited.
(1) This section applies where— (a) a court proceeding under section 47(1) above decided not to make a confiscation order (“the decision”); and (b) the statement made by the court under section 48(8) above was to the effect that the reason, or one of the reasons, for the decision was that the court was not satisfied that the defendant had benefited. (2) If the prosecution has evidence— (a) which was not considered by the court, but (b) which the prosecution believes would have led the court to decide that the defendant had benefited, the prosecution may apply to the Crown Court for it to consider that evidence. (3) If, having considered the evidence, the court considers that it would have been satisfied that the defendant had benefited if that evidence had been available to it, section 47 shall apply as if the court were convicting the defendant. (4) The court may take into account any money or other property obtained by the defendant on or after the date of the decision, but only if the prosecution shows that it was obtained by him as a direct or indirect result of terrorist-related activities carried on by the defendant or another on or before that date. (5) In considering any evidence under this section which relates to any money or other property to which subsection (4) above applies, the court shall not make the assumptions which would otherwise be required by section 51 below. (6) No application shall be entertained by the court under this section if it is made after the end of the period of six years beginning with the date on which the defendant was convicted. (7) Subsections (1) to (7) of section 48 above shall not apply where the court is proceeding under section 47 above by virtue of this section. (8) Where the court— (a) has, in dealing with the defendant in respect of the conviction or any of the convictions concerned, made an order for the payment of compensation under Article 3 of the Order of 1980, and (b) makes a confiscation order by virtue of this section, it shall, if it is of the opinion that the defendant will not have sufficient means to satisfy both orders in full, direct that so much of the compensation as will not in its opinion be recoverable because of the insufficiency of his means is to be paid out of any sums recovered under the confiscation order. (9) Where the prosecution makes an application to the court under this section it shall, on making the application, give the court a statement under section 52 below. (10) Where the High Court— (a) has been asked to proceed under section 52B below in relation to a defendant who has absconded, but (b) has decided not to make a confiscation order against him, this section shall not apply at any time while he remains an absconder. (11) In this section “benefited” means benefited from terrorist-related activities as mentioned in section 47(1) above.
48A Re-assessment of whether defendant has benefited.
(1) This section applies where— (a) a court proceeding under section 47(1) above decided not to make a confiscation order (“the decision”); and (b) the statement made by the court under section 48(8) above was to the effect that the reason, or one of the reasons, for the decision was that the court was not satisfied that the defendant had benefited. (2) If the prosecution has evidence— (a) which was not considered by the court, but (b) which the prosecution believes would have led the court to decide that the defendant had benefited, the prosecution may apply to the Crown Court for it to consider that evidence. (3) If, having considered the evidence, the court considers that it would have been satisfied that the defendant had benefited if that evidence had been available to it, section 47 shall apply as if the court were convicting the defendant. (4) The court may take into account any money or other property obtained by the defendant on or after the date of the decision, but only if the prosecution shows that it was obtained by him as a direct or indirect result of terrorist-related activities carried on by the defendant or another on or before that date. (5) In considering any evidence under this section which relates to any money or other property to which subsection (4) above applies, the court shall not make the assumptions which would otherwise be required by section 51 below. (6) No application shall be entertained by the court under this section if it is made after the end of the period of six years beginning with the date on which the defendant was convicted. (7) Subsections (1) to (7) of section 48 above shall not apply where the court is proceeding under section 47 above by virtue of this section. (8) Where the court— (a) has, in dealing with the defendant in respect of the conviction or any of the convictions concerned, made an order for the payment of compensation under Article 3 of the Order of 1980, and (b) makes a confiscation order by virtue of this section, it shall, if it is of the opinion that the defendant will not have sufficient means to satisfy both orders in full, direct that so much of the compensation as will not in its opinion be recoverable because of the insufficiency of his means is to be paid out of any sums recovered under the confiscation order. (9) Where the prosecution makes an application to the court under this section it shall, on making the application, give the court a statement under section 52 below. (10) Where the High Court— (a) has been asked to proceed under section 52B below in relation to a defendant who has absconded, but (b) has decided not to make a confiscation order against him, this section shall not apply at any time while he remains an absconder. (11) In this section “benefited” means benefited from terrorist-related activities as mentioned in section 47(1) above.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.