Northern Ireland (Emergency Provisions) Act 1991 (repealed 25.8.1996)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
54 Concealing or transferring proceeds of terrorist-related activities.
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a) conceals or disguises any property which is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, his proceeds of terrorist-related activities; or (b) converts or transfers that property or removes it from the jurisdiction, for the purpose of avoiding prosecution for a relevant offence or the making or enforcement in his case of a confiscation order. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if, knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities, he— (a) conceals or disguises that property; or (b) converts or transfers that property or removes it from the jurisdiction, for the purpose of assisting any person to avoid prosecution for a relevant offence or the making or enforcement of a confiscation order. (3) A person is guilty of an offence if, knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities, he acquires or uses that property or has possession of it. (3A) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section that the person charged acquired or used the property or had possession of it for adequate consideration. (4) In subsections (1)(a) and (2)(a) above the references to concealing or disguising any property include references to concealing or disguising its nature, source, location, disposition, movement or ownership or any rights with respect to it. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3A) above— (a) a person acquires property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of the property; (b) a person uses or has possession of any property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of his possession or use of the property; and (c) the provision for any person of services or goods which are of assistance to him in terrorist-related activities shall not be treated as consideration. (5A) Where a person discloses to a constable a suspicion or belief that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities or any matter on which such a suspicion or belief is based— (a) the disclosure shall not be treated as a breach of any restriction upon the disclosure of information imposed by statute or otherwise; and (b) if he does any act in contravention of subsection (3) above, he does not commit an offence under that subsection if— (i) the disclosure is made before he does the act concerned and that act is done with the consent of the constable; or (ii) the disclosure is made after he does the act but on his initiative and as soon as it is reasonable for him to make it. (5B) For the purposes of this section, having possession of any property shall be taken to be doing an act in relation to it. (5C) In proceedings against a person for an offence under subsection (3) above, it is a defence to prove that— (a) he intended to disclose to a constable such a suspicion, belief or matter as is mentioned in subsection (5A) above; but (b) there is reasonable excuse for his failure to make a disclosure in accordance with paragraph (b) of that subsection. (5D) In the case of a person who was in employment at the relevant time, subsections (5A) and (5C) above shall have effect in relation to disclosures, and intended disclosures, to the appropriate person in accordance with the procedure established by his employer for the making of such disclosures as they have effect in relation to disclosures, and intended disclosures, to a constable. (5E) No constable or other person shall be guilty of an offence under subsection (3) above in respect of anything done by him in the course of acting in connection with the enforcement, or intended enforcement, of any provision of this Act or of any other enactment relating to terrorism or the proceeds or resources of such terrorism. (6) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years or a fine or both; (b) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both.
54 Concealing or transferring proceeds of terrorist-related activities.
(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he— (a) conceals or disguises any property which is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, his proceeds of terrorist-related activities; or (b) converts or transfers that property or removes it from the jurisdiction, for the purpose of avoiding prosecution for a relevant offence or the making or enforcement in his case of a confiscation order. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if, knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities, he— (a) conceals or disguises that property; or (b) converts or transfers that property or removes it from the jurisdiction, for the purpose of assisting any person to avoid prosecution for a relevant offence or the making or enforcement of a confiscation order. (3) A person is guilty of an offence if, knowing or having reasonable cause to suspect that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities, he acquires or uses that property or has possession of it. (3A) It is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under this section that the person charged acquired or used the property or had possession of it for adequate consideration. (4) In subsections (1)(a) and (2)(a) above the references to concealing or disguising any property include references to concealing or disguising its nature, source, location, disposition, movement or ownership or any rights with respect to it. (5) For the purposes of subsection (3A) above— (a) a person acquires property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of the property; (b) a person uses or has possession of any property for inadequate consideration if the value of the consideration is significantly less than the value of his possession or use of the property; and (c) the provision for any person of services or goods which are of assistance to him in terrorist-related activities shall not be treated as consideration. (5A) Where a person discloses to a constable a suspicion or belief that any property is, or in whole or in part directly or indirectly represents, another person’s proceeds of terrorist-related activities or any matter on which such a suspicion or belief is based— (a) the disclosure shall not be treated as a breach of any restriction upon the disclosure of information imposed by statute or otherwise; and (b) if he does any act in contravention of subsection (3) above, he does not commit an offence under that subsection if— (i) the disclosure is made before he does the act concerned and that act is done with the consent of the constable; or (ii) the disclosure is made after he does the act but on his initiative and as soon as it is reasonable for him to make it. (5B) For the purposes of this section, having possession of any property shall be taken to be doing an act in relation to it. (5C) In proceedings against a person for an offence under subsection (3) above, it is a defence to prove that— (a) he intended to disclose to a constable such a suspicion, belief or matter as is mentioned in subsection (5A) above; but (b) there is reasonable excuse for his failure to make a disclosure in accordance with paragraph (b) of that subsection. (5D) In the case of a person who was in employment at the relevant time, subsections (5A) and (5C) above shall have effect in relation to disclosures, and intended disclosures, to the appropriate person in accordance with the procedure established by his employer for the making of such disclosures as they have effect in relation to disclosures, and intended disclosures, to a constable. (5E) No constable or other person shall be guilty of an offence under subsection (3) above in respect of anything done by him in the course of acting in connection with the enforcement, or intended enforcement, of any provision of this Act or of any other enactment relating to terrorism or the proceeds or resources of such terrorism. (6) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable— (a) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years or a fine or both; (b) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.