Civil Evidence Act 1968
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE Consequential Amendments.
Section 17. Act amended | Amendment The Hop (Prevention of Frauds) Act 1866 (29 & 30 Vict. c. 37) | . . . The Explosive Substances Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 3) | In section 6(2) (answers to be inadmissible against person giving them), for the word “himself ” there shall be substituted the words “that witness or the husband or wife of that witness ”, after the word “him ”, where it first occurs, there shall be inserted the words “or her ”, and for the words “against him ” there shall be substituted the words “against that person or the husband or wife of that person ” ... | ... The Borrowing (Control and Guarantees) Act 1946 (9 & 10 Geo. 6. c. 58) | . . . “ ” “ ”. The Representation of the People Act 1949 (12, 13 & 14 Geo. 6. c. 68) | . . . The Baking Industry (Hours of Work) Act 1954 (2 & 3 Eliz. 2. c. 57) | . . . The Wages Councils Act 1959 7 & 8 Eliz. 2. c. 69 | . . . The Factories Act 1961 (9 & 10 Eliz. 2. c. 34) | In section 146(1)(f) (privilege against self-incrimination), after the word “himself ” there shall be inserted the words “or, in the case of a person who is married, his or her wife or husband ”. The Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963 (c. 41) | In section 53(1)(d) (answers to be inadmissable against the person giving them), for the words “against him ” there shall be substituted the words “against that person or the husband or wife of that person ”. The National Insurance Act 1965 (1965 c. 51) | . . . The National Insurance (Industrial Injuries Act 1965 (1965 c. 52) | . . . The Selective Employment Payments Act 1966 (1966 c. 32) | In section 8(3) (privilege against self-incrimination), after the word “him ” there shall be added the words “or, in the case of a person who is married, his or her wife or husband ”.
SCHEDULE Consequential Amendments.
Section 17. Act amended | Amendment The Hop (Prevention of Frauds) Act 1866 (29 & 30 Vict. c. 37) | . . . The Explosive Substances Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 3) | In section 6(2) (answers to be inadmissible against person giving them), for the word “himself ” there shall be substituted the words “that witness or the husband or wife of that witness ”, after the word “him ”, where it first occurs, there shall be inserted the words “or her ”, and for the words “against him ” there shall be substituted the words “against that person or the husband or wife of that person ” ... | ... The Borrowing (Control and Guarantees) Act 1946 (9 & 10 Geo. 6. c. 58) | . . . “ ” “ ”. The Representation of the People Act 1949 (12, 13 & 14 Geo. 6. c. 68) | . . . The Baking Industry (Hours of Work) Act 1954 (2 & 3 Eliz. 2. c. 57) | . . . The Wages Councils Act 1959 7 & 8 Eliz. 2. c. 69 | . . . The Factories Act 1961 (9 & 10 Eliz. 2. c. 34) | In section 146(1)(f) (privilege against self-incrimination), after the word “himself ” there shall be inserted the words “or, in the case of a person who is married, his or her wife or husband ”. The Offices, Shops and Railway Premises Act 1963 (c. 41) | In section 53(1)(d) (answers to be inadmissable against the person giving them), for the words “against him ” there shall be substituted the words “against that person or the husband or wife of that person ”. The National Insurance Act 1965 (1965 c. 51) | . . . The National Insurance (Industrial Injuries Act 1965 (1965 c. 52) | . . . The Selective Employment Payments Act 1966 (1966 c. 32) | In section 8(3) (privilege against self-incrimination), after the word “him ” there shall be added the words “or, in the case of a person who is married, his or her wife or husband ”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.