The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
39 Care (excess actual costs) award
(1) The amount of the care (excess actual costs) award in relation to an eligible infected person (“P”) is the lesser of— (a) A – B, where— (i) “A” is the sum of the annual amounts for each year of the relevant period, and the annual amount for a year is the aggregate of money paid to obtain commercially-provided care for P during that year as established by evidence accompanying the application and treated as increased in accordance with paragraph (2); (ii) “B” is P’s total past care award, or (b) 0.25 × (B ÷ C), where— (i) “B” is P’s total past care award; (ii) “C” is— (aa) 1, if P is not deceased on the date of their infected core application and is not an infected SSP recipient; (bb) otherwise, 0.75. (2) The aggregate of money paid to obtain commercially-provided care for P during each year of the relevant period is to be treated as if it had been, at the beginning of each April during the period which— (a) begins with the April after the end of the year in which the money was paid, and (b) ends with April 2024, compounded by the consumer price index over the 12-month period ending with the month of September before that April. (3) Where the amount of the care (excess actual costs) award is less than £0, that amount is to be treated as £0.
39 Care (excess actual costs) award
(1) The amount of the care (excess actual costs) award in relation to an eligible infected person (“P”) is the lesser of— (a) A – B, where— (i) “A” is the sum of the annual amounts for each year of the relevant period, and the annual amount for a year is the aggregate of money paid to obtain commercially-provided care for P during that year as established by evidence accompanying the application and treated as increased in accordance with paragraph (2); (ii) “B” is P’s total past care award, or (b) 0.25 × (B ÷ C), where— (i) “B” is P’s total past care award; (ii) “C” is— (aa) 1, if P is not deceased on the date of their infected core application and is not an infected SSP recipient; (bb) otherwise, 0.75. (2) The aggregate of money paid to obtain commercially-provided care for P during each year of the relevant period is to be treated as if it had been, at the beginning of each April during the period which— (a) begins with the April after the end of the year in which the money was paid, and (b) ends with April 2024, compounded by the consumer price index over the 12-month period ending with the month of September before that April. (3) Where the amount of the care (excess actual costs) award is less than £0, that amount is to be treated as £0.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.