The Infected Blood Compensation Scheme Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
42 Applications for further infected core payments
(1) A further core application in relation to an eligible infected person (“P”) must be made by the end of the period of 6 years beginning with the day on which the further diagnosis to which the application relates was made. (2) A further core application may not be made in relation to P— (a) where P is deceased, (b) where an application has been made in relation to P under Chapter 2, until, in respect of each infected supplemental award— (i) an application has been made in relation to P and that application has been finally determined, or (ii) the relevant person has confirmed that no such application is to be made, or (c) where an application has been made in relation to P under this Chapter, until that application has been finally determined. (3) Where the relevant person seeks to establish that P has— (a) a new infection, the application must be accompanied by evidence which establishes— (i) the diagnosis of the infection specified in regulation 3(3), (ii) which of paragraph (2), (6), (7) or (8) of regulation 3 applies as to the cause or origin of the new infection, (iii) where P’s new infection is HIV, the date on which the further diagnosis was given, and (iv) where P’s new infection is Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C (or both), the severity of the infection; (b) an increase in the severity of any Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection which causes the infection to fall within a higher severity level, the application must be accompanied by evidence which establishes the new severity level of the infection.
42 Applications for further infected core payments
(1) A further core application in relation to an eligible infected person (“P”) must be made by the end of the period of 6 years beginning with the day on which the further diagnosis to which the application relates was made. (2) A further core application may not be made in relation to P— (a) where P is deceased, (b) where an application has been made in relation to P under Chapter 2, until, in respect of each infected supplemental award— (i) an application has been made in relation to P and that application has been finally determined, or (ii) the relevant person has confirmed that no such application is to be made, or (c) where an application has been made in relation to P under this Chapter, until that application has been finally determined. (3) Where the relevant person seeks to establish that P has— (a) a new infection, the application must be accompanied by evidence which establishes— (i) the diagnosis of the infection specified in regulation 3(3), (ii) which of paragraph (2), (6), (7) or (8) of regulation 3 applies as to the cause or origin of the new infection, (iii) where P’s new infection is HIV, the date on which the further diagnosis was given, and (iv) where P’s new infection is Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C (or both), the severity of the infection; (b) an increase in the severity of any Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C infection which causes the infection to fall within a higher severity level, the application must be accompanied by evidence which establishes the new severity level of the infection.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.